The dust-continuum size of TNG50 galaxies at $z=1-5$: a comparison with the distribution of stellar light, stars, dust and H$_2$

AI-generated keywords: Dust-Continuum Radiative Transfer Half-Light Radius Obscuration Star Formation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Dust-continuum half-light radius at 850 μm is 75% larger than stellar half-mass radius
  • Dust continuum emission is more compact compared to 1.6 μm (H-band) emission, especially at higher redshifts
  • Compactness of dust continuum emission is due to obscuration of stellar light from galaxy centers
  • Compact dust continuum emission does not indicate dense central stellar component in galaxies at redshifts > 1
  • Dust continuum half-light radius closely traces regions with half of star formation in galaxies
  • Single band dust continuum emission can be used as a reliable tracer for locating obscured star formation
  • Dust continuum emission exhibits greater compactness compared to H2 mass and underlying dust mass distributions
  • Dust continuum strongly correlates with regions characterized by high temperatures but not necessarily where most H2 and/or dust are concentrated
  • These findings provide valuable insights into main sequence galaxies and their dust continuum properties
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Gergö Popping, Annalisa Pillepich, Gabriela Calistro Rivera, Sebastian Schulz, Lars Hernquist, Melanie Kaasinen, Federico Marinacci, Dylan Nelson, Mark Vogelsberger

arXiv: 2101.12218v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
Submitted to MNRAS

Abstract: We present predictions for the extent of the dust-continuum emission of thousands of main-sequence galaxies drawn from the TNG50 simulation between $z=1-5$. To this aim, we couple the radiative transfer code SKIRT to the output of the TNG50 simulation and measure the dust-continuum half-light radius of the modeled galaxies, assuming a Milky Way dust type and a metallicity dependent dust-to-metal ratio. The dust-continuum half-light radius at observed-frame 850 $\mu$m is up to $\sim$75 per cent larger than the stellar half-mass radius, but significantly more compact than the observed-frame 1.6 $\mu$m (roughly corresponding to H-band) half-light radius, particularly towards high redshifts: the compactness compared to the 1.6 $\mu$m emission increases with redshift. This is driven by obscuration of stellar light from the galaxy centres, which increases the apparent extent of 1.6 $\mu$m disk sizes relative to that at 850 $\mu$m. The difference in relative extents increases with redshift because the observed-frame 1.6 $\mu$m emission stems from ever shorter wavelength stellar emission. These results suggest that the compact dust-continuum emission observed in $z>1$ galaxies is not (necessarily) evidence of the buildup of a dense central stellar component. We also find that the dust-continuum half-light radius very closely follows the radius containing half the star formation in galaxies, indicating that single band dust-continuum emission is a good tracer of the location of (obscured) star formation. The dust-continuum emission is more compact than the H2 mass (for galaxies at $z\geq 2$) and the underlying dust mass. The dust emission strongly correlates with locations with the highest dust temperatures, which do not need to be the locations where most H$_2$ and/or dust is located. The presented results are a common feature of main-sequence galaxies.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Jan. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2101.12218v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this study, the authors investigate the extent of dust-continuum emission in main-sequence galaxies at redshifts between 1 and 5 using data from the TNG50 simulation. They employ the radiative transfer code SKIRT to model the dust-continuum half-light radius of thousands of galaxies, assuming a Milky Way dust type and a metallicity-dependent dust-to-metal ratio. The results reveal that the dust-continuum half-light radius at an observed-frame wavelength of 850 μm is approximately 75% larger than the stellar half-mass radius. However, it is significantly more compact compared to the observed-frame 1.6 μm (H-band) half-light radius, particularly at higher redshifts. This increased compactness with respect to the 1.6 μm emission is driven by obscuration of stellar light from galaxy centers, which enhances the apparent size of disk structures at shorter wavelengths. Importantly, these findings suggest that the compact dust-continuum emission observed in galaxies at redshifts greater than 1 does not necessarily indicate the presence of a dense central stellar component. Furthermore, it is found that the dust continuum half light radius closely traces regions containing half of star formation in galaxies; thus single band dust continuum emission can serve as a reliable tracer for locating obscured star formation. Additionally, it is noted that compared to both H2 mass (for galaxies at z ≥ 2) and underlying dust mass distributions; dust continuum emission exhibits greater compactness and strongly correlates with regions characterized by high temperatures but does not necessarily coincide with locations where most H2 and/or dust are concentrated. Overall, these results provide valuable insights into main sequence galaxies and highlight common features regarding their dust continuum properties.
Created on 19 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.