A negotiating protocol for group decision support systems

AI-generated keywords: Interactive decision support systems Multi-agent system model Negotiation protocol Multicriteria analysis methods Collaborative decision-making

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focuses on developing an interactive decision support system for group decision-making
  • Objective is to accurately represent diversity of stakeholders and their behaviors within a group setting
  • Designed and implemented a multi-agent system model using negotiation protocol based on mediation and concession
  • Decision-makers can express preferences using multicriteria analysis methods such as AHP and PROMETHEE II
  • Solution addresses complex nature of decision-making problems by integrating various multicriteria decision support methods
  • Multi-agent systems effectively represent multiplicity and diversity of actors involved in decision-making process
  • Enables collective decision-making through deterministic message-sending protocol
  • Developed user-friendly web interface to facilitate interaction among decision-makers during the process
  • Tools used for implementation include WampServer with PHP, JavaScript, HTML, CSS, IDE NetBeans with Java language, JADE for multi-agent system and negotiation aspects
  • Study contributes to advancing group decision support systems by incorporating advanced negotiation protocols and multicriteria analysis methods into the decision-making process
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Safia Sadji

in French
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Our contribution concerns interactive decision support systems for group decision support. Through this study, we apply to implement a decisional process aiming to represent the multiplicity of actors, their diversity, their behaviors and their interactions. In this context, we contribute to the design and development of a group decision support system. The system is modeled by a multi agents system while exploiting a negotiation protocol based on mediation and concession. This protocol allows decision-makers to express their preferences using multicriteria analysis methods, mainly the method by total aggregation AHP (Hierarchical Process Analysis) and the method by partial aggregation PROMETHEE II .

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Jan. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2101.03580v1

In this study, we focus on developing an interactive decision support system for group decision-making. Our main objective is to accurately represent the diversity of stakeholders and their behaviors within a group setting. To achieve this, we have designed and implemented a multi-agent system model that utilizes a negotiation protocol based on mediation and concession. This allows decision-makers to express their preferences using multicriteria analysis methods such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE II. By integrating various multicriteria decision support methods, our solution addresses the complex nature of decision-making problems. Through the use of multi-agent systems, our system effectively represents the multiplicity and diversity of actors involved in the decision-making process. It also enables collective decision-making by implementing a deterministic message-sending protocol. Additionally, we have developed a user-friendly web interface to facilitate interaction among decision-makers during the process. To implement our solution, we utilized tools such as WampServer with PHP, JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for styling purposes. For development purposes, we used IDE NetBeans with Java language. The multi-agent system and negotiation aspects were implemented using JADE. Overall, our study contributes to advancing group decision support systems by incorporating advanced negotiation protocols and multicriteria analysis methods into the decision-making process. The successful implementation of our proposed solution demonstrates its potential in improving collaborative decision-making processes within diverse stakeholder groups.
Created on 09 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.