Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2012.15445v1

The field of artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing and has shown impressive performance in various tasks through the use of deep learning methods. However, a major drawback of these models is their lack of interpretability. To address this limitation, researchers have been developing post hoc techniques to explain the predictions made by these models, giving rise to the field of explainability. Recent progress in explainability has been particularly notable in the domains of images and texts. In parallel, advancements in graph data analysis have led to the development of graph neural networks (GNNs) and their associated explainability methods. Despite this progress, there remains a lack of standardized approaches for evaluating GNN explainability. To bridge this gap, a group of researchers including Hao Yuan, Haiyang Yu, Shurui Gui, and Shuiwang Ji conducted a comprehensive survey on explainability in GNNs. Their work provides a unified and taxonomic view of current GNN explainability methods, shedding light on both commonalities and differences among existing techniques. By establishing a standardized testbed for evaluations and generating benchmark graph datasets specifically tailored for GNN explainability assessments, they aim to facilitate further methodological developments in this area. Overall, this survey offers a detailed examination of the state-of-the-art in GNN explainability methods and sets the stage for future advancements in enhancing the interpretability and transparency of deep learning models applied to graph data analysis.

• - The field of artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing through deep learning methods
• - Lack of interpretability is a major drawback of deep learning models
• - Researchers have been developing post hoc techniques for explainability
• - Recent progress in explainability has been notable in images and texts
• - Advancements in graph data analysis led to the development of graph neural networks (GNNs) and their explainability methods
• - Lack of standardized approaches for evaluating GNN explainability
• - Hao Yuan, Haiyang Yu, Shurui Gui, and Shuiwang Ji conducted a comprehensive survey on GNN explainability
• - The survey provides a unified view of current GNN explainability methods
• - A standardized testbed for evaluations and benchmark datasets were created to facilitate further methodological developments
• - The survey examines the state-of-the-art in GNN explainability methods and sets the stage for future advancements

Summary1. Artificial intelligence is a smart technology that is getting better using deep learning. 2. Deep learning models can be hard to understand, which is a problem. 3. Scientists are working on ways to explain how deep learning works after it has been used. 4. They have made good progress in explaining how deep learning works with pictures and words. 5. New types of smart networks called graph neural networks have been created, but it's still tricky to explain how they work. Definitions- Artificial Intelligence: Smart technology that can learn and make decisions like humans. - Deep Learning: A type of artificial intelligence that uses complex algorithms to learn from data. - Explainability: The ability to understand and explain how something works or makes decisions. - Graph Neural Networks (GNNs): Smart networks that can process information in a structured way using graphs.

The field of artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in recent years, particularly with the use of deep learning methods. These models have shown impressive performance in various tasks, ranging from image and speech recognition to natural language processing. However, a major drawback of these models is their lack of interpretability. This means that while they can accurately make predictions, it is often difficult for humans to understand how or why those predictions were made. To address this limitation, researchers have been developing post hoc techniques to explain the predictions made by AI models. This has given rise to the field of explainability, which aims to provide insights into the decision-making process of these complex systems. Recent progress in explainability has been particularly notable in the domains of images and texts. In parallel, advancements in graph data analysis have led to the development of graph neural networks (GNNs) and their associated explainability methods. Despite this progress, there remains a lack of standardized approaches for evaluating GNN explainability. To bridge this gap, a group of researchers including Hao Yuan, Haiyang Yu, Shurui Gui, and Shuiwang Ji conducted a comprehensive survey on explainability in GNNs. Their work provides a unified and taxonomic view of current GNN explainability methods, shedding light on both commonalities and differences among existing techniques. One key aspect highlighted by the authors is that there are two main types of explanations provided by GNNs: global explanations and local explanations. Global explanations aim to provide an overall understanding of how the model makes decisions across all inputs and outputs. On the other hand, local explanations focus on explaining individual predictions or subsets within larger datasets. The survey also delves into different categories within each type of explanation method used by GNNs such as feature attribution methods (e.g., gradient-based), rule extraction methods (e.g., decision trees), perturbation-based methods (e.g., input masking), and model-agnostic methods (e.g., LIME). By categorizing these methods, the authors provide a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art in GNN explainability. In addition to discussing various techniques for GNN explainability, the survey also highlights challenges and limitations in this field. One major challenge is the lack of standardized evaluation metrics and datasets specifically tailored for GNN explainability assessments. To address this issue, the authors propose a standardized testbed for evaluations and generate benchmark graph datasets that can be used to compare different methods. Overall, this survey offers a detailed examination of the state-of-the-art in GNN explainability methods. It not only provides insights into existing techniques but also sets the stage for future advancements in enhancing the interpretability and transparency of deep learning models applied to graph data analysis. With continued research and development in this area, we can expect to see more interpretable AI models that can provide meaningful explanations for their decisions. This will not only increase trust in these systems but also open up new possibilities for their use in critical applications such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous vehicles.