Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models Security Implications Training Data Extraction Attack Vulnerabilities

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models with billions of parameters are increasingly being developed and deployed in artificial intelligence.
  • Concerns have been raised about the security implications associated with training these models on vast amounts of data, including private datasets.
  • A study by Nicholas Carlini and team revealed a vulnerability where malicious entities can extract specific examples from a model's training data through querying, as demonstrated on GPT-2.
  • The researchers successfully extracted sensitive information like personally identifiable details, IRC conversations, code snippets, and 128-bit UUIDs from GPT-2's training data.
  • Larger language models are more susceptible to such extraction attacks compared to smaller models according to the study's findings.
  • Developers and organizations using large language models should implement robust safeguards and protocols during training processes to mitigate risks of unauthorized access or leakage of sensitive information.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramer, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Tom Brown, Dawn Song, Ulfar Erlingsson, Alina Oprea, Colin Raffel

Abstract: It has become common to publish large (billion parameter) language models that have been trained on private datasets. This paper demonstrates that in such settings, an adversary can perform a training data extraction attack to recover individual training examples by querying the language model. We demonstrate our attack on GPT-2, a language model trained on scrapes of the public Internet, and are able to extract hundreds of verbatim text sequences from the model's training data. These extracted examples include (public) personally identifiable information (names, phone numbers, and email addresses), IRC conversations, code, and 128-bit UUIDs. Our attack is possible even though each of the above sequences are included in just one document in the training data. We comprehensively evaluate our extraction attack to understand the factors that contribute to its success. Worryingly, we find that larger models are more vulnerable than smaller models. We conclude by drawing lessons and discussing possible safeguards for training large language models.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Dec. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2012.07805v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of artificial intelligence, the development and deployment of large language models have become increasingly prevalent. These models, often containing billions of parameters, are typically trained on vast amounts of data, including private datasets. However, a concerning revelation has emerged regarding the security implications associated with such practices. A recent study conducted by Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramer, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Tom Brown, Dawn Song, Ulfar Erlingsson, Alina Oprea and Colin Raffel sheds light on a potential vulnerability inherent in these large language models. The researchers demonstrate that malicious entities can exploit a training data extraction attack to retrieve specific examples from the model's training data simply by querying it. The focus of their investigation was GPT-2 - a prominent language model trained on snippets gathered from the public Internet. Through their attack methodology,the team was able to extract numerous verbatim text sequences from GPT-2's training data. These extracted examples encompassed various forms of sensitive information such as personally identifiable details (names,p hone numbers,email addresses), IRC conversations,c ode snippets,and 128-bit UUIDs. Remarkably,this extraction was successful even when each sequence appeared only once in the training data. To gain deeper insights into the factors influencing the efficacy of their extraction attack comprehensive evaluations were carried out by the researchers.Alarmingly,their findings indicated that larger language models are more susceptible to such attacks compared to smaller counterparts.As a result of their study outcomes and observations made during experimentation with GPT-2's vulnerabilities to data extraction attacks,it is imperative for developers and organizations utilizing large language models to implement robust safeguards and protocols during training processes to mitigate potential risks associated with unauthorized access or leakage of sensitive information. This research serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of prioritizing security measures in AI development and deployment practices.
Created on 08 Aug. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.