Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2011.14999v1

In their paper titled "An Automatic Finite-Sample Robustness Metric: Can Dropping a Little Data Change Conclusions? ", authors Tamara Broderick, Ryan Giordano, and Rachael Meager propose a novel method to evaluate the sensitivity of econometric analyses to the exclusion of a small portion of the sample. The authors introduce a finite-sample metric known as the Approximate Maximum Influence Perturbation to approximate the number or fraction of observations that exert the most significant influence on a given result when removed from the analysis. This metric is designed to be automatically computable and applicable to various common estimators such as OLS, IV, GMM, MLE, and variational Bayes. The authors provide explicit finite-sample error bounds for linear and instrumental variables regressions, offering a precise lower bound on sensitivity for any estimator at minimal computational cost. Through empirical applications, Broderick et al. demonstrate that even simple 2-parameter linear regression analyses of randomized trials can exhibit high sensitivity to data perturbations. They also show that dropping less than 1% of the sample can lead to a change in the sign of a treatment effect in certain cases, despite small standard errors. This highlights the importance of assessing robustness in econometric analyses and provides a valuable tool in identifying influential observations that may significantly impact study conclusions when omitted from the analysis.

• - Authors: Tamara Broderick, Ryan Giordano, Rachael Meager
• - Proposed method: Approximate Maximum Influence Perturbation
• - Purpose: Evaluate sensitivity of econometric analyses to exclusion of small sample portion
• - Applicability: OLS, IV, GMM, MLE, variational Bayes estimators
• - Benefits:
• - Automatically computable
• - Provides finite-sample error bounds for linear and instrumental variables regressions
• - Identifies influential observations that can impact study conclusions if omitted

SummaryAuthors Tamara Broderick, Ryan Giordano, and Rachael Meager created a new method called Approximate Maximum Influence Perturbation to see how sensitive economic analyses are when small parts of the data are left out. This method can be used with different types of estimators like OLS, IV, GMM, MLE, and variational Bayes. It helps by automatically calculating results and giving error boundaries for linear and instrumental variables regressions. It also shows which data points are important and could change the study's findings if not included. Definitions- Authors: People who wrote the research or article. - Proposed method: A new way of doing something that is suggested by the authors. - Purpose: The reason why the authors did their research. - Applicability: How useful the proposed method is with different types of estimators. - Benefits: The good things that come from using this new method.

Introduction In the field of econometrics, it is common practice to analyze data sets and draw conclusions based on statistical models. However, these conclusions may not always be robust to small changes in the data. In their paper titled "An Automatic Finite-Sample Robustness Metric: Can Dropping a Little Data Change Conclusions?", Tamara Broderick, Ryan Giordano, and Rachael Meager introduce a novel method for evaluating the sensitivity of econometric analyses to the exclusion of a small portion of the sample. Background The concept of robustness in econometrics refers to the ability of an analysis or model to withstand variations or perturbations in the data without significantly altering its results or conclusions. This is important because real-world data sets are often subject to errors, missing values, and other imperfections that can impact study findings. Therefore, it is crucial to assess how sensitive an analysis is to these potential perturbations. Methodology Broderick et al.'s proposed method introduces a finite-sample metric known as Approximate Maximum Influence Perturbation (AMIP) that measures the number or fraction of observations that have the most significant influence on a given result when removed from the analysis. This metric is designed to be automatically computable and applicable to various common estimators such as OLS, IV, GMM, MLE, and variational Bayes. The authors provide explicit finite-sample error bounds for linear and instrumental variables regressions using AMIP. These error bounds offer a precise lower bound on sensitivity for any estimator at minimal computational cost. This allows researchers to easily identify influential observations that may significantly impact study conclusions when omitted from the analysis. Empirical Applications To demonstrate their method's effectiveness, Broderick et al. conducted several empirical applications using randomized trials with simple 2-parameter linear regression analyses. They found that even these basic analyses can exhibit high sensitivity to data perturbations. Furthermore, the authors showed that dropping less than 1% of the sample can lead to a change in the sign of a treatment effect in certain cases, despite small standard errors. This highlights the importance of assessing robustness in econometric analyses and how influential observations can significantly impact study conclusions. Conclusion In conclusion, Broderick et al.'s paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of econometrics by introducing an automatic finite-sample robustness metric. Their method allows for easy identification of influential observations and provides precise error bounds for various estimators. Through empirical applications, they demonstrate the high sensitivity of even simple analyses to data perturbations and emphasize the importance of assessing robustness in econometric studies. This research has significant implications for future econometric analyses and serves as a useful tool for researchers to ensure their results are not overly influenced by a small portion of their data set.