Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2011.03161v2

In their study titled "What's New? Summarizing Contributions in Scientific Literature," authors Hiroaki Hayashi, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Nazneen Rajani, and Caiming Xiong address the challenge of keeping up with the vast amount of academic articles being shared daily. They propose a new task called disentangled paper summarization which aims to generate separate summaries for the contributions and context of scientific papers. To support this task, the authors extend the S2ORC corpus by adding "contribution" and "context" reference labels across various domains. The authors introduce three baseline approaches for disentangled paper summarization: 1) a unified model controlled by input code prefixes; 2) a model with separate generation heads specialized in producing disentangled outputs; and 3) a training strategy that incorporates additional supervision from inbound and outbound citations. They also propose an automatic evaluation protocol that measures the relevance, novelty, and disentanglement of generated summaries. To validate their approach, the authors conduct a human study involving expert annotators. The results show that in 79% of cases their new task is considered more helpful than traditional scientific paper summarization methods. Overall, this study presents a novel approach to addressing the challenge of staying updated with scientific literature by generating separate summaries for contributions and context. The proposed methods show promising results in helping researchers quickly identify key findings in academic articles.

• - Authors propose a new task called disentangled paper summarization
• - Task aims to generate separate summaries for contributions and context of scientific papers
• - S2ORC corpus is extended with "contribution" and "context" reference labels
• - Three baseline approaches for disentangled paper summarization are introduced
• 1) Unified model controlled by input code prefixes
• 2) Model with separate generation heads for disentangled outputs
• 3) Training strategy incorporating additional supervision from citations
• - Automatic evaluation protocol measures relevance, novelty, and disentanglement of generated summaries
• - Human study involving expert annotators validates the approach
• - New task considered more helpful than traditional scientific paper summarization methods in 79% of cases
• - Approach shows promising results in helping researchers identify key findings quickly

The authors came up with a new task called disentangled paper summarization. This task is about creating two different summaries for scientific papers - one for the main ideas and another for the background information. They used a dataset called S2ORC and added labels to help with the summaries. They also introduced three different ways to do these summaries, including using codes, separate parts, and citations. They tested their methods and found that they were helpful in finding important information in research papers." Definitions - Disentangled: Separated or divided into different parts. - Summarization: Creating a shorter version of something that includes only the most important points. - Contributions: The main ideas or findings of something. - Context: The background or surrounding information of something. - Corpus: A large collection of written or spoken texts used for research. - Baseline approaches: Different methods or strategies that are used as a starting point for comparison. - Relevance: How closely something relates to what you are looking for or interested in. - Novelty: Something new or original that has not been seen before. - Automatic evaluation protocol: A set of rules or guidelines used to measure how well something is done automatically, without human involvement. - Human study: A research project involving people as participants to gather data or opinions. - Expert annotators: People who have special knowledge or skills in a particular area and who add notes or comments to something. - Promising results: Outcomes that show potential success or

Staying Up to Date with Scientific Literature: Introducing Disentangled Paper Summarization

In the ever-growing world of scientific literature, it can be difficult for researchers to stay up to date with the latest findings. To address this challenge, authors Hiroaki Hayashi, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Nazneen Rajani and Caiming Xiong have proposed a new task called disentangled paper summarization in their study titled “What’s New? Summarizing Contributions in Scientific Literature”. This approach aims to generate separate summaries for the contributions and context of scientific papers so that readers can quickly identify key findings.

The S2ORC Corpus

To support this task, the authors extended the S2ORC corpus by adding “contribution” and “context” reference labels across various domains. The S2ORC corpus is a large-scale dataset containing over 1 million abstracts from computer science papers published between 1990 and 2019. It includes both structured information such as title, author names and publication year as well as unstructured text data such as abstracts or full texts. By adding contribution and context labels to this dataset, the authors were able to create a more comprehensive resource for disentangled paper summarization tasks.

Baseline Approaches

The authors introduced three baseline approaches for disentangled paper summarization: 1) A unified model controlled by input code prefixes; 2) A model with separate generation heads specialized in producing disentangled outputs; 3) A training strategy that incorporates additional supervision from inbound and outbound citations.

Automatic Evaluation Protocol

To validate their approach further, they also proposed an automatic evaluation protocol which measures the relevance, novelty and disentanglement of generated summaries using metrics such as ROUGE scores (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation). This allows them to compare different models objectively based on how accurately they summarize scientific articles into distinct contributions and contexts sections.

Human Study Results

Finally, they conducted a human study involving expert annotators who evaluated generated summaries against traditional methods of scientific paper summarization. The results showed that 79% of cases found their new task more helpful than traditional methods – indicating promising potential for helping researchers quickly identify key findings in academic articles without having to read through entire documents themselves. Overall, this study presents a novel approach to addressing the challenge of staying updated with scientific literature by generating separate summaries for contributions and context sections within academic articles – allowing readers to quickly understand what is being discussed without needing extensive background knowledge or reading through entire documents themselves.