A survey and analysis of TLS interception mechanisms and motivations

AI-generated keywords: TLS end-to-end protocol user security network operations interception mechanisms

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • TLS (Transport Layer Security) is a crucial protocol for enhancing user security and privacy
  • It provides confidentiality and integrity guarantees, protecting against surveillance of unencrypted traffic
  • Challenges arise for common network operations due to middleboxes interfering with TLS
  • Various methods exist to circumvent TLS confidentiality goals through man-in-the-middle solutions
  • New proposals aim to extend TLS capabilities for third parties, trusted middleboxes, and verification mechanisms
  • Study by Xavier de Carné de Carnavalet and Paul C. van Oorschot explores implications of TLS interception on network operations
  • 19 scenarios identified where access to unencrypted traffic remains relevant despite TLS encryption
  • Survey of 30 schemes altering the traditional end-to-end security model provided by TLS, including caching middleboxes like Content Delivery Networks
  • Comparison of schemes based on deployability, security characteristics, and alignment with stakeholders' incentives
  • Research contributes valuable insights to discussions on network encryption protocols
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xavier de Carné de Carnavalet, Paul C. van Oorschot

This paper will appear in ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract: TLS is an end-to-end protocol designed to provide confidentiality and integrity guarantees that improve end-user security and privacy. While TLS helps defend against pervasive surveillance of intercepted unencrypted traffic, it also hinders several common beneficial operations typically performed by middleboxes on the network traffic. Consequently, various methods have been proposed that "bypass" the confidentiality goals of TLS by playing with keys and certificates essentially in a man-in-the-middle solution, as well as new proposals that extend the protocol to accommodate third parties, delegation schemes to trusted middleboxes, and fine-grained control and verification mechanisms. We first review the use cases expecting plain HTTP traffic and discuss the extent to which TLS hinders these operations. We retain 19 scenarios where access to unencrypted traffic is still relevant and evaluate the incentives of the stakeholders involved. Second, we survey 30 schemes by which TLS no longer delivers end-to-end security, and by which the notion of an "end" changes, including caching middleboxes such as Content Delivery Networks. Finally, we compare each scheme based on deployability and security characteristics, and evaluate their compatibility with the stakeholders' incentives. Our analysis leads to a number of key findings, observations, and research questions that we believe will be of interest to practitioners, policy makers and researchers.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Oct. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.16388v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

TLS (Transport Layer Security) is a crucial end-to-end protocol that aims to enhance user security and privacy by providing confidentiality and integrity guarantees. It effectively safeguards against pervasive surveillance of unencrypted traffic but poses challenges for common network operations conducted by middleboxes. Various methods have been proposed to circumvent the confidentiality goals of TLS through man-in-the-middle solutions involving manipulation of keys and certificates. New proposals have also emerged to extend the protocol's capabilities to accommodate third parties, delegation schemes to trusted middleboxes, and fine-grained control and verification mechanisms. In their comprehensive study titled "A survey and analysis of TLS interception mechanisms and motivations," authors Xavier de Carné de Carnavalet and Paul C. van Oorschot delve into the implications of TLS interception on network operations. They first examine use cases where plain HTTP traffic is expected, evaluating how TLS impedes these operations. They identify 19 scenarios where access to unencrypted traffic remains relevant, analyzing the incentives of stakeholders involved in such scenarios. Furthermore, the study surveys 30 schemes that alter the traditional end-to-end security model provided by TLS. These schemes redefine the concept of an "end" by introducing mechanisms such as caching middleboxes like Content Delivery Networks. The authors compare each scheme based on deployability and security characteristics while assessing their alignment with stakeholders' incentives. The analysis presented in this study yields key findings, observations, and research questions that are pertinent to practitioners, policymakers, and researchers in the field of network security. By exploring the motivations behind TLS interception mechanisms and their impact on end-user security and privacy, this research contributes valuable insights to ongoing discussions surrounding network encryption protocols.
Created on 09 Apr. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.