Learning Improvised Chatbots from Adversarial Modifications of Natural Language Feedback
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper discusses improving chatbots by utilizing data from user interactions
- The authors propose a self-feeding chatbot that solicits natural language feedback from users
- A generative adversarial model is introduced to convert noisy feedback into plausible responses
- The proposed model consists of a generator and a discriminator
- Performance improvement is demonstrated on the Personachat dataset, increasing from 69.94% to 75.96%
- Attention maps are analyzed for different modification types and statistics are provided based on random feedback texts
- Accuracy is assessed using FEED2RESP (the proposed model)
- The approach enhances chatbot performance by converting noisy user feedback into plausible responses
- Results demonstrate significant improvements in ranking correct responses on a large dataset
- The work contributes to advancing chatbot technology by leveraging user interactions to enhance capabilities.
Authors: Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Kun Ni, Siva Reddy
Abstract: The ubiquitous nature of chatbots and their interaction with users generate an enormous amount of data. Can we improve chatbots using this data? A self-feeding chatbot improves itself by asking natural language feedback when a user is dissatisfied with its response and uses this feedback as an additional training sample. However, user feedback in most cases contains extraneous sequences hindering their usefulness as a training sample. In this work, we propose a generative adversarial model that converts noisy feedback into a plausible natural response in a conversation. The generator's goal is to convert the feedback into a response that answers the user's previous utterance and to fool the discriminator which distinguishes feedback from natural responses. We show that augmenting original training data with these modified feedback responses improves the original chatbot performance from 69.94% to 75.96% in ranking correct responses on the Personachat dataset, a large improvement given that the original model is already trained on 131k samples.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.