Visual Security Evaluation of Learnable Image Encryption Methods against Ciphertext-only Attacks

AI-generated keywords: Privacy-preserving DNNs Visual information protection Ciphertext-only attacks Adversarial tactics Defense mechanisms

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Various visual information protection methods have been developed to safeguard sensitive data in privacy-preserving deep neural networks (DNNs).
  • Researchers evaluated the visual security of state-of-the-art protection methods against ciphertext-only attacks (COAs), focusing on four prominent attack strategies: brute-force attack, feature reconstruction attack (FR-Attack), inverse transformation attack (ITN-Attack), and GAN-based attack (GAN-Attack).
  • Most protection methods lack sufficient robustness against GAN-Attack, highlighting the need for enhanced security measures to counter advanced adversarial tactics.
  • Some protection methods showed resilience against GAN-Attack, offering promising avenues for fortifying visual security in privacy-preserving DNNs.
  • The study sheds light on the complex relationship between visual protection methods and adversarial attacks in deep learning, identifying weaknesses and strengths in current approaches to pave the way for more secure and reliable privacy-preserving DNN frameworks.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Warit Sirichotedumrong, Hitoshi Kiya

To be appeared in APSIPA ASC 2020

Abstract: Various visual information protection methods have been proposed for privacy-preserving deep neural networks (DNNs). In contrast, attack methods on such protection methods have been studied simultaneously. In this paper, we evaluate state-of-the-art visual protection methods for privacy-preserving DNNs in terms of visual security against ciphertext-only attacks (COAs). We focus on brute-force attack, feature reconstruction attack (FR-Attack), inverse transformation attack (ITN-Attack), and GAN-based attack (GAN-Attack), which have been proposed to reconstruct visual information on plain images from the visually-protected images. The detail of various attack is first summarized, and then visual security of the protection methods is evaluated. Experimental results demonstrate that most of protection methods, including pixel-wise encryption, have not enough robustness against GAN-Attack, while a few protection methods are robust enough against GAN-Attack.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Oct. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.06198v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of privacy-preserving deep neural networks (DNNs), various visual information protection methods have been developed to safeguard sensitive data. These methods aim to protect against sophisticated attack techniques that constantly challenge their effectiveness. In a recent study by Warit Sirichotedumrong and Hitoshi Kiya, researchers evaluated the visual security of state-of-the-art protection methods against ciphertext-only attacks (COAs). They focused on four prominent attack strategies: brute-force attack, feature reconstruction attack (FR-Attack), inverse transformation attack (ITN-Attack), and GAN-based attack (GAN-Attack). The goal of these attacks is to reconstruct visual information from visually-protected images, exposing vulnerabilities in existing protection mechanisms. Through a comprehensive analysis, it was revealed that most protection methods lack sufficient robustness against GAN-Attack, including pixel-wise encryption. This highlights the urgent need for enhanced security measures to counter advanced adversarial tactics. However, a select few protection methods showed resilience against GAN-Attack, offering promising avenues for fortifying visual security in privacy-preserving DNNs. The findings from this study shed light on the complex relationship between visual protection methods and adversarial attacks in the realm of deep learning. By identifying weaknesses and strengths in current approaches, researchers can pave the way for more secure and reliable privacy-preserving DNN frameworks. Ultimately, this research provides valuable insights towards enhancing defense mechanisms against evolving threats in visual data security.
Created on 24 Sep. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.