Biomechanical monitoring and machine learning for the detection of lying postures

AI-generated keywords: Pressure Ulcer Posture Mobility Machine Learning Monitoring

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Pressure mapping technology is effective in evaluating pressure ulcer risk but does not provide information about posture or mobility
  • Researchers aimed to develop an automated approach to detect different static lying postures and transitions between them
  • 19 healthy subjects participated in the study and adopted various sagittal and lateral lying postures
  • Parameters related to interactions at the support surface and body movements were continuously monitored
  • Derivative signals effectively detected transitions between postures, with actimetry providing distinct signal perturbations
  • Three machine learning algorithms (Naïve-Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Machine classifiers) were assessed for predicting static postures
  • Accuracy of the algorithms ranged from 82% to 100% for Naïve-Bayes, 70% to 98% for k-Nearest Neighbors, and 69% to 100% for Support Vector Machine classifiers
  • Combining machine learning algorithms with robust parameters from two monitoring systems allows for reliable detection of both static postures and their corresponding transitions
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Silvia Caggiari (TIMC-GMCAO), Peter Worsley (TIMC-GMCAO), Yohan Payan (TIMC-GMCAO), Marek Bucki, Dan Bader

Clinical Biomechanics, Elsevier, 2020, pp.105181
arXiv: 2010.03804v1 - DOI (physics.med-ph)

Abstract: Background: Pressure mapping technology has been adapted to monitor over prolonged periods to evaluate pressure ulcer risk in individuals during extended lying postures. However, temporal pressure distribution signals are not currently used to identify posture or mobility. The present study was designed to examine the potential of an automated approach for the detection of a range of static lying postures and corresponding transitions between postures.Methods: Healthy subjects (n = 19) adopted a range of sagittal and lateral lying postures. Parameters reflecting both the interactions at the support surface and body movements were continuously monitored. Subsequently, the derivative of each signal was examined to identify transitions between postures. Three machine learning algorithms, namely Na{\"i}ve-Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbors and Support Vector Machine classifiers, were assessed to predict a range of static postures, established with a training model (n = 9) and validated with new input from test data (n = 10).Findings: Results showed that the derivative signals provided a means to detect transitions between postures, with actimetry providing the most distinct signal perturbations. The accuracy in predicting the range of postures from new test data ranged between 82%--100%, 70%--98% and 69%--100% for Na{\"i}ve-Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbors and Support Vector Machine classifiers, respectively.Interpretation: The present study demonstrated that detection of both static postures and their corresponding transitions was achieved by combining machine learning algorithms with robust parameters from two monitoring systems. This approach has the potential to provide reliable indicators of posture and mobility, to support personalised pressure ulcer prevention strategies.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Oct. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.03804v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study focuses on the use of pressure mapping technology to monitor individuals at risk of pressure ulcers during extended lying postures. While this technology is effective in evaluating pressure ulcer risk, it does not currently provide information about posture or mobility. Therefore, the researchers aimed to develop an automated approach that can detect different static lying postures and transitions between them. Nineteen healthy subjects participated in the study and adopted various sagittal and lateral lying postures. The researchers continuously monitored parameters related to interactions at the support surface and body movements. They then examined the derivative of each signal to identify transitions between postures. To predict a range of static postures, three machine learning algorithms (Naïve-Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Machine classifiers) were assessed using a training model consisting of data from nine subjects. The accuracy of these algorithms was then validated using new input from ten test subjects. The results showed that the derivative signals effectively detected transitions between postures, with actimetry providing the most distinct signal perturbations. The machine learning algorithms achieved high accuracy in predicting the range of postures from new test data, ranging from 82% to 100% for Naïve-Bayes, 70% to 98% for k-Nearest Neighbors, and 69% to 100% for Support Vector Machine classifiers. Overall, this study demonstrates that combining machine learning algorithms with robust parameters from two monitoring systems allows for reliable detection of both static postures and their corresponding transitions which can support personalized strategies for preventing pressure ulcers.
Created on 05 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.