Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.00133v1

In their paper "CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models," authors Nikita Nangia, Clara Vania, Rasika Bhalerao, and Samuel R. Bowman address the issue of cultural biases present in pretrained language models. These models have shown success in various natural language processing tasks but also perpetuate harmful stereotypes due to the biases present in the training data. To combat this problem, the authors introduce the Crowdsourced Stereotype Pairs benchmark (CrowS-Pairs), a dataset comprising 1508 examples that focus on stereotypes related to nine types of bias such as race, religion, and age. The key objective of CrowS-Pairs is to measure social biases in language models against protected demographic groups in the United States. Each example in the dataset presents a model with two sentences: one that embodies a stereotype more strongly and another that contains less stereotyping. The dataset specifically targets stereotypes associated with historically disadvantaged groups and contrasts them with those related to advantaged groups. Through their evaluation of three widely-used MLMs using CrowS-Pairs, the authors make a significant finding – these models consistently favor sentences expressing stereotypes across all categories within the benchmark. This observation underscores the urgent need for developing less biased language models. As efforts continue towards creating more equitable AI systems, CrowS-Pairs emerges as a valuable benchmark for assessing progress in mitigating social biases within language models. The dataset serves as a critical tool for researchers and practitioners striving to build fairer and more inclusive NLP technologies.

• - Authors address cultural biases in pretrained language models
• - Introduction of Crowdsourced Stereotype Pairs benchmark (CrowS-Pairs)
• - Dataset comprises 1508 examples focusing on stereotypes related to nine types of bias
• - Objective is to measure social biases in language models against protected demographic groups in the United States
• - Each example presents a model with two sentences: one embodying a stereotype more strongly, and another with less stereotyping
• - Evaluation of three widely-used MLMs using CrowS-Pairs reveals consistent favoring of sentences expressing stereotypes across all categories
• - Urgent need for developing less biased language models highlighted
• - CrowS-Pairs emerges as a valuable benchmark for assessing progress in mitigating social biases within language models, serving as a critical tool for researchers and practitioners aiming to build fairer and more inclusive NLP technologies

Summary- Authors are talking about how some computer programs that understand language can have wrong ideas because of cultural differences. - They made a new test called CrowS-Pairs to check for these mistakes, with 1508 examples focusing on nine types of biases. - The goal is to see if these programs show unfair ideas about different groups of people in the United States. - Each test has two sentences: one with a strong wrong idea and one with a weaker wrong idea. - When they tested three popular programs, they found that all of them tended to prefer sentences with wrong ideas. Definitions- Authors: People who write books or articles. - Cultural biases: Incorrect beliefs or opinions based on different cultures. - Pretrained language models: Computer programs that can understand and generate human language without being taught each word individually. - Stereotypes: Fixed ideas or beliefs about a particular type of person or thing that may not be true.

Introduction

In recent years, pretrained language models (MLMs) have shown remarkable success in various natural language processing tasks. These models are trained on large amounts of text data and can generate human-like responses to prompts. However, a growing concern with these models is the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes due to biases present in the training data. In their paper "CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models," authors Nikita Nangia, Clara Vania, Rasika Bhalerao, and Samuel R. Bowman address this issue by introducing the Crowdsourced Stereotype Pairs benchmark (CrowS-Pairs). This dataset aims to measure social biases in MLMs against protected demographic groups in the United States.

The Problem of Cultural Biases in Pretrained Language Models

While pretrained MLMs have shown impressive performance on various NLP tasks such as text completion and sentiment analysis, they also reflect societal biases present in the training data. This means that these models may perpetuate harmful stereotypes related to race, gender, religion, age, and other factors. For example, a model trained on biased data may associate certain occupations or characteristics with specific genders or races. This poses a significant challenge for creating fair and inclusive AI systems as language models are increasingly being used in real-world applications such as chatbots and virtual assistants. The presence of biased language can reinforce discrimination and exclusion towards marginalized communities.

The Need for a Benchmark Dataset

To address this problem, Nangia et al. introduce CrowS-Pairs – a dataset comprising 1508 examples that focus on nine types of bias related to historically disadvantaged groups such as African Americans and women compared to advantaged groups like white people and men. Each example presents two sentences: one that embodies a stereotype more strongly (biased sentence) and another that contains less stereotyping (unbiased sentence). The authors note that previous datasets for measuring biases in language models have limitations such as being too small or focusing on a specific type of bias. CrowS-Pairs, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive evaluation by covering multiple types of stereotypes and demographic groups.

The Crowdsourced Stereotype Pairs Benchmark

CrowS-Pairs consists of 1508 examples divided into nine categories: gender, race, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, age, disability status, socioeconomic status (SES), and occupation. Each category has approximately 167 examples with an equal number of biased and unbiased sentences. For example: - Gender: "She is a nurse" (biased) vs. "She is a doctor" (unbiased) - Race: "He committed a crime" (biased) vs. "He was wrongly accused" (unbiased) - Religion: "They are terrorists" (biased) vs. "They are activists" (unbiased) The dataset also includes annotations from crowdworkers who were asked to rate the level of stereotyping in each biased sentence on a scale from 1 to 5.

Evaluation Results

To evaluate MLMs' performance on CrowS-Pairs, the authors used three widely-used models – BERT-base uncased, RoBERTa-large uncased, and GPT-2 medium – and compared their predictions against human judgments. The results showed that all three models consistently favored sentences expressing stereotypes across all categories within the benchmark. This finding highlights the urgent need for developing less biased language models as these systems can potentially amplify societal biases rather than mitigating them.

Implications for Fairer NLP Technologies

As efforts continue towards creating more equitable AI systems, CrowS-Pairs emerges as a valuable benchmark for assessing progress in mitigating social biases within language models. The dataset serves as a critical tool for researchers and practitioners striving to build fairer and more inclusive NLP technologies. By providing a diverse range of examples covering multiple types of stereotypes and demographic groups, CrowS-Pairs enables a more comprehensive evaluation of MLMs' performance in terms of bias. This can inform the development of mitigation strategies to reduce biases in language models. Moreover, the authors note that CrowS-Pairs can also be used as a training dataset for developing less biased MLMs. By fine-tuning on this benchmark, models can learn to recognize and avoid stereotypical associations in their responses.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Nangia et al.'s paper "CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models" addresses the issue of cultural biases present in pretrained language models through the introduction of CrowS-Pairs – a benchmark dataset comprising 1508 examples focusing on nine types of bias related to protected demographic groups. Their evaluation results show that current MLMs consistently favor sentences expressing stereotypes across all categories within the benchmark, highlighting the urgent need for developing less biased language models. As efforts continue towards creating fairer AI systems, CrowS-Pairs emerges as a valuable tool for assessing progress and informing future developments in mitigating social biases within language models.