Residual Learning from Demonstration

AI-generated keywords: Robotic Manipulation Contacts Friction Residual Learning from Demonstration (rLfD) Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMP)

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Contacts and friction are fundamental factors in robotic manipulation tasks
  • Researchers propose a framework called residual learning from demonstration (rLfD)
  • rLfD combines dynamic movement primitives (DMP) with reinforcement learning (RL) based residual correction policy
  • rLfD operates in task space, utilizing the full pose of the robot
  • rLfD demonstrates superior performance compared to alternative methods
  • rLfD enhances the generalization abilities of DMPs
  • The researchers train an agent to successfully perform insertions of pegs, gears, and plugs into sockets in simulated and real-world environments
  • The study contributes to advancing robotic manipulation capabilities by introducing a novel framework combining DMPs with RL-based residual correction
  • Results show improved performance and generalization abilities in contact-rich tasks involving insertion.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Todor Davchev, Kevin Sebastian Luck, Michael Burke, Franziska Meier, Stefan Schaal, Subramanian Ramamoorthy

Abstract: Contacts and friction are inherent to nearly all robotic manipulation tasks. Through the motor skill of insertion, we study how robots can learn to cope when these attributes play a salient role. In this work we propose residual learning from demonstration (rLfD), a framework that combines dynamic movement primitives (DMP) that rely on behavioural cloning with a reinforcement learning (RL) based residual correction policy. The proposed solution is applied directly in task space and operates on the full pose of the robot. We show that rLfD outperforms alternatives and improves the generalisation abilities of DMPs. We evaluate this approach by training an agent to successfully perform both simulated and real world insertions of pegs, gears and plugs into respective sockets.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Aug. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2008.07682v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study of robotic manipulation tasks, contacts and friction are fundamental factors that robots must contend with. To address this challenge, researchers propose a framework called residual learning from demonstration (rLfD). This framework combines dynamic movement primitives (DMP) with a reinforcement learning (RL) based residual correction policy. The key feature of rLfD is its application in task space, where it operates on the full pose of the robot. By directly addressing the task space and utilizing the complete robot pose information, rLfD demonstrates superior performance compared to alternative methods. Additionally, rLfD enhances the generalization abilities of DMPs. To evaluate their approach, the researchers train an agent to successfully perform insertions of pegs, gears, and plugs into their respective sockets in both simulated and real-world environments. Overall, this study contributes to advancing robotic manipulation capabilities by introducing a novel framework that combines DMPs with RL-based residual correction. The results demonstrate improved performance and generalization abilities in handling contact-rich tasks involving insertion.
Created on 18 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.