Mirostat: A Perplexity-Controlled Neural Text Decoding Algorithm

AI-generated keywords: Neural text decoding high-quality texts language models top-k sampling perplexity

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Neural text decoding is important for generating high-quality texts using language models
  • Popular decoding algorithms like top-k, top-p (nucleus), and temperature-based sampling can truncate or distort the unreliable low probability tail of the language model
  • The authors provide a theoretical analysis of perplexity in top-k, top-p, and temperature sampling
  • They propose a feedback-based adaptive top-k text decoding algorithm called mirostat that allows for generating text with any length while maintaining a predetermined value of perplexity
  • Mirostat enables the generation of high-quality text without extensive parameter tuning
  • Experiments show that perplexity drops significantly with generated text length for low values of k and p in top-k and top-p sampling, but mirostat successfully avoids this issue
  • Cross-entropy has a near-linear relation with repetition in generated text across different sampling methods, although it slightly depends on the specific language model used
  • Mirostat offers control over repetitions and helps generate high-quality texts without arbitrary parameter tuning
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sourya Basu, Govardana Sachitanandam Ramachandran, Nitish Shirish Keskar, Lav R. Varshney

18 pages, 8 figures

Abstract: Neural text decoding is important for generating high-quality texts using language models. To generate high-quality text, popular decoding algorithms like top-k, top-p (nucleus), and temperature-based sampling truncate or distort the unreliable low probability tail of the language model. Though these methods generate high-quality text after parameter tuning, they are ad hoc. Not much is known about the control they provide over the statistics of the output, which is important since recent reports show text quality is highest for a specific range of likelihoods. Here, first we provide a theoretical analysis of perplexity in top-k, top-p, and temperature sampling, finding that cross-entropy behaves approximately linearly as a function of p in top-p sampling whereas it is a nonlinear function of k in top-k sampling, under Zipfian statistics. We use this analysis to design a feedback-based adaptive top-k text decoding algorithm called mirostat that generates text (of any length) with a predetermined value of perplexity, and thereby high-quality text without any tuning. Experiments show that for low values of k and p in top-k and top-p sampling, perplexity drops significantly with generated text length, which is also correlated with excessive repetitions in the text (the boredom trap). On the other hand, for large values of k and p, we find that perplexity increases with generated text length, which is correlated with incoherence in the text (confusion trap). Mirostat avoids both traps: experiments show that cross-entropy has a near-linear relation with repetition in generated text. This relation is almost independent of the sampling method but slightly dependent on the model used. Hence, for a given language model, control over perplexity also gives control over repetitions.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 Jul. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2007.14966v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Neural text decoding plays a crucial role in generating high-quality texts using language models. However, popular decoding algorithms like top-k, top-p (nucleus), and temperature-based sampling often truncate or distort the unreliable low probability tail of the language model. While these methods can generate high-quality text after parameter tuning, they are ad hoc and lack control over the statistics of the output. To address this issue, the authors of the paper provide a theoretical analysis of perplexity in top-k, top-p, and temperature sampling. They find that cross-entropy behaves approximately linearly as a function of p in top-p sampling, while it is a nonlinear function of k in top-k sampling under Zipfian statistics. Based on this analysis, they propose a feedback-based adaptive top-k text decoding algorithm called mirostat. This algorithm allows for generating text with any length while maintaining a predetermined value of perplexity. By doing so, it enables the generation of high-quality text without requiring extensive parameter tuning. The experiments conducted by the authors reveal interesting insights. For low values of k and p in top-k and top-p sampling, perplexity drops significantly with generated text length. However, mirostat successfully avoids both traps. The experiments demonstrate that cross-entropy has a near-linear relation with repetition in generated text. This relationship remains consistent across different sampling methods but slightly depends on the specific language model used. In conclusion,, mirostat offers control over repetitions and helps generate high-quality texts without relying on arbitrary parameter tuning. This research contributes valuable insights into understanding and improving the decoding process of language models.
Created on 07 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.