Effects of different feeding frequencies on growth, feed utilisation, digestive enzyme activities and plasma biochemistry of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) fed with different fishmeal and fish oil dietary levels

AI-generated keywords: Feeding Frequency Gilthead Sea Bream Mediterranean Aquaculture Digestive Enzyme Activity Plasma Biochemistry

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Feeding frequency during the on-growing phase of Mediterranean aquaculture has received little attention
  • A study investigated the effects of different feeding frequencies on gilthead sea bream
  • Three feeding frequencies were tested: one meal per day, two meals per day, and three meals per day
  • Feeding frequency did not significantly affect overall performance or feed efficiency
  • Pepsin activity decreased in fish receiving more than one meal a day, particularly in low fishmeal diets
  • Trypsin levels decreased with an increasing number of meals only under low fishmeal/fish oil diet
  • Plasma parameters related to nutritional and physiological conditions were not affected by feeding frequency
  • Fish fed a single daily meal with high fishmeal/fish oil level exhibited higher plasma creatinine levels
  • Gilthead sea bream can maximize feed utilization regardless of the number of meals provided
  • Findings could be valuable for optimizing fish growth and reducing feeding costs in Mediterranean aquaculture.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: S. Busti (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), A. Bonaldo (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), F. Dondi (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), D. Cavallini (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), M. Yufera (Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía), N. Gilannejad (Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía), F. J. Moyano (Department of Biology and Geology Universidad de Almería), P. P Gatta (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna), L. Parma (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences University of Bologna)

arXiv: 2007.08464v2 - DOI (q-bio.TO)
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: In the context of Mediterranean aquaculture little attention has been paid to the manipulation of feeding frequency at the on-growing phase. The effects of different feeding frequencies: one meal per day, two meals per day, three meals per day on growth, digestive enzyme activity, feed digestibility and plasma biochemistry were studied in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L. 1758) fed with high and low fishmeal and fish oil levels. Isonitrogenous and isolipidic extruded diets were fed to triplicate fish groups by a fixed ration over 109 days. No significant effects of feeding frequency on overall performance, feed efficiency and feed digestibility during the on-growing of gilthead sea bream fed high or low fishmeal and fish oil dietary level were observed. Pepsin activity showed an apparent decrease in fish receiving more than one meal a day which was not compensated by an increased production of alkaline proteases particularly in fish fed on low FM. Although there were no effects on growth and feed utilisation at increasing feeding frequency, trypsin decreased significantly with an increasing number of meals only under low FMFO diet. Thus, it seemed that consecutive meals could have amplified the potential trypsin inhibitor effect of the vegetable meal-based diet adopted. Results of the plasma parameters related to nutritional and physiological conditions were not affected by feeding frequency. The higher level of plasma creatinine detected in fish fed a single daily meal with high FMFO level seems to be within physiological values in relation to the higher protein efficiency observed with this diet. According to the results, gilthead sea bream seems able to maximise feed utilisation regardless of the number of meals, and this could be a useful indicator for planning feeding activity at farm level to optimise growth of fish and costs of feeding procedures.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Jul. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2007.08464v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the context of Mediterranean aquaculture, the manipulation of feeding frequency during the on-growing phase has received little attention. To address this gap, a study was conducted to investigate the effects of different feeding frequencies on the growth, digestive enzyme activity, feed digestibility, and plasma biochemistry of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). The fish were fed diets with varying levels of fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO), and three different feeding frequencies were tested: one meal per day, two meals per day, and three meals per day. Over a period of 109 days, triplicate groups of fish were fed isonitrogenous and isolipidic extruded diets by a fixed ration. The results showed that feeding frequency did not have significant effects on overall performance or feed efficiency in gilthead sea bream fed high or low FM and FO dietary levels. However, pepsin activity appeared to decrease in fish receiving more than one meal a day without an accompanying increase in alkaline protease production; this effect was particularly evident in fish fed on low FM diets. Trypsin levels decreased significantly with an increasing number of meals only under the low FMFO diet; this suggests that consecutive meals may have amplified the potential trypsin inhibitor effect of the vegetable meal-based diet used. The study also examined plasma parameters related to nutritional and physiological conditions and found that they were not affected by feeding frequency. However, fish fed a single daily meal with a high FMFO level exhibited higher levels of plasma creatinine; although this increase was within physiological values it correlated with higher protein efficiency observed with this diet. Based on these findings it can be concluded that gilthead sea bream is capable of maximizing feed utilization regardless of the number of meals provided. This information could be valuable for planning feeding activities at the farm level to optimize fish growth and reduce feeding costs. Overall, this study contributes to a better understanding of the effects of feeding frequency on the performance and physiology of gilthead sea bream in Mediterranean aquaculture.
Created on 22 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.