Legends: Folklore on Reddit

AI-generated keywords: Reddit Legends Folklore Computational Science/HCI Text-Based Approaches Cultural Markers

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Reddit legends are venerated old posts that have gained fame within the Reddit community
  • The authors aim to explore the utility of Reddit legends in computational science/HCI and folkloristics
  • They investigate whether these posts can be considered folklore, examining factors such as consistent form, cultural significance, and spontaneous transmission
  • They explore whether Reddit legends can be studied systematically
  • The authors create a typology to categorize different types of Reddit legends and analyze references to these legends within the platform
  • They examine textual characteristics related to referencing behavior
  • Reddit legends meet the criteria for being considered folklore and can be effectively studied using text-based approaches
  • The findings have implications for future analyses of folklore on Reddit, enabling tracking of subreddit-wide and individual-user behavior related to folklore
  • There is potential for exploring the relationship between this behavior and other cultural markers present within the platform
  • This paper establishes a foundation for further research in computational science/HCI and folkloristics by demonstrating the systematic studyability of Reddit legends as digital folklore.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Caitrin Armstrong, Derek Ruths

Abstract: In this paper we introduce Reddit legends, a collection of venerated old posts that have become famous on Reddit. To establish the utility of Reddit legends for both computational science/HCI and folkloristics, we investigate two main questions: (1) whether they can be considered folklore, i.e. if they have consistent form, cultural significance, and undergo spontaneous transmission, and (2) whether they can be studied in a systematic manner. Through several subtasks, including the creation of a typology, an analysis of references to Reddit legends, and an examination of some of the textual characteristics of referencing behaviour, we show that Reddit legends can indeed be considered as folklore and that they are amendable to systematic text-based approaches. We discuss how these results will enable future analyses of folklore on Reddit, including tracking subreddit-wide and individual-user behaviour, and the relationship of this behaviour to other cultural markers.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jul. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2007.00750v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Legends: Folklore on Reddit," authors Caitrin Armstrong and Derek Ruths introduce the concept of Reddit legends, which are venerated old posts that have gained fame within the Reddit community. The authors aim to explore the utility of Reddit legends in both computational science/HCI and folkloristics by addressing two main questions. Firstly, they investigate whether these posts can be considered folklore, examining factors such as their consistent form, cultural significance, and spontaneous transmission. Secondly, they explore whether Reddit legends can be studied in a systematic manner. To answer these questions, the authors undertake several subtasks. They create a typology to categorize different types of Reddit legends and analyze references to these legends within the platform. Additionally, they examine textual characteristics related to referencing behavior. Through their analysis, they demonstrate that Reddit legends do indeed meet the criteria for being considered folklore and can be effectively studied using text-based approaches. The findings of this research have significant implications for future analyses of folklore on Reddit. The authors discuss how their results enable tracking of subreddit-wide and individual-user behavior related to folklore. Furthermore, they highlight the potential for exploring the relationship between this behavior and other cultural markers present within the platform. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the phenomenon of Reddit legends as a form of digital folklore. It establishes a foundation for further research in computational science/HCI and folkloristics by demonstrating the systematic studyability of these online cultural artifacts.
Created on 03 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.