Track Seeding and Labelling with Embedded-space Graph Neural Networks
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The <Organization>Exa.TrkX project</Organization> is focused on handling the large-scale data from the HL-LHC.
- Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been identified as a promising solution for particle track reconstruction.
- GNNs process event data as a graph, connecting track measurements and candidate line segments between hits.
- Message-passing GNNs have shown success in predicting doublet likelihood, leading to further exploration of advanced architectures.
- Advancements in graph construction and embedded representations have enabled fully learned end-to-end track finding.
- Construction of graphs from learned representations with non-linear metric structures improves clustering and neighborhood queries.
- The framework integrates with traditional clustering pipelines and GNN approaches, offering versatility in application.
- Embedded graphs feed into high-accuracy doublet and triplet classifiers or can be used as an end-to-end track classifier through clustering in an embedded space.
- Post-processing techniques informed by detector physics knowledge enhance performance significantly.
Authors: Nicholas Choma, Daniel Murnane, Xiangyang Ju, Paolo Calafiura, Sean Conlon, Steven Farrell, Prabhat, Giuseppe Cerati, Lindsey Gray, Thomas Klijnsma, Jim Kowalkowski, Panagiotis Spentzouris, Jean-Roch Vlimant, Maria Spiropulu, Adam Aurisano, V Hewes, Aristeidis Tsaris, Kazuhiro Terao, Tracy Usher
Abstract: To address the unprecedented scale of HL-LHC data, the Exa.TrkX project is investigating a variety of machine learning approaches to particle track reconstruction. The most promising of these solutions, graph neural networks (GNN), process the event as a graph that connects track measurements (detector hits corresponding to nodes) with candidate line segments between the hits (corresponding to edges). Detector information can be associated with nodes and edges, enabling a GNN to propagate the embedded parameters around the graph and predict node-, edge- and graph-level observables. Previously, message-passing GNNs have shown success in predicting doublet likelihood, and we here report updates on the state-of-the-art architectures for this task. In addition, the Exa.TrkX project has investigated innovations in both graph construction, and embedded representations, in an effort to achieve fully learned end-to-end track finding. Hence, we present a suite of extensions to the original model, with encouraging results for hitgraph classification. In addition, we explore increased performance by constructing graphs from learned representations which contain non-linear metric structure, allowing for efficient clustering and neighborhood queries of data points. We demonstrate how this framework fits in with both traditional clustering pipelines, and GNN approaches. The embedded graphs feed into high-accuracy doublet and triplet classifiers, or can be used as an end-to-end track classifier by clustering in an embedded space. A set of post-processing methods improve performance with knowledge of the detector physics. Finally, we present numerical results on the TrackML particle tracking challenge dataset, where our framework shows favorable results in both seeding and track finding.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.