Managing Consensus-Based Cooperative Task Allocation for IIoT Networks
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper addresses the challenge of task allocation in the Internet of Things (IoT) industry
- Task allocation aims to enhance information quality and maximize task performance
- Existing approaches do not consider information quality and distributed allocation across cluster services
- The paper proposes a mechanism called CONTASKI for task allocation in Industrial IoT (IIoT) networks
- CONTASKI uses collaborative consensus and similarity capabilities to allocate tasks
- CONTASKI achieved 100% task allocation in scenarios with 75 and 100 nodes
- On average, more than 80% of clusters successfully performed tasks within a low response time
- The approach presented in the paper effectively addresses the challenge of task allocation in IIoT networks
Authors: Carlos Pedroso, Yan Uehara de Moraes, Michele Nogueira, Aldri Santos
Abstract: Current IoT services include industry-oriented services, which often require objects to run more than one task. However, the exponential growth of objects in IoT poses the challenge of distributing and managing task allocation among objects. One of the main goals of task allocation is to improve the quality of information and maximize the tasks to be performed. Although there are approaches that optimize and manage the dynamics of nodes, not all consider the quality of information and the distributed allocation over the cluster service. This paper proposes the mechanism CONTASKI for task allocation in IIoT networks to distribute tasks among objects. It relies on collaborative consensus to allocate tasks and similarity capabilities to know which objects can play in accomplishing those tasks. CONTASKI was evaluated on NS-3 and achieved 100% of allocated tasks incases with 75 and 100 nodes, and, on average, more than 80% clusters performed tasks in a low response time.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.