The Importance of Low Latency to Order Book Imbalance Trading Strategies

AI-generated keywords: High-frequency trading low latency order book imbalance strategy financial markets agent-based simulation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study by David Byrd, Sruthi Palaparthi, Maria Hybinette, and Tucker Hybinette Balch on low latency in order book imbalance trading strategies
  • Competitive "arms race" among financial firms for low latency access to exchanges
  • Use of agent-based interactive discrete event simulation due to lack of historical data with trader identity and location information
  • Introduction of experimental traders pursuing a low-latency order book imbalance (OBI) strategy
  • Inverse correlation between latency and profit for OBI traders
  • Importance of latency rank over absolute magnitude in determining profits for agents with similar strategies
  • Nuanced interplay between latency levels and trading strategy effectiveness in high-frequency trading environments
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: David Byrd, Sruthi Palaparthi, Maria Hybinette, Tucker Hybinette Balch

arXiv: 2006.08682v1 - DOI (q-fin.TR)

Abstract: There is a pervasive assumption that low latency access to an exchange is a key factor in the profitability of many high-frequency trading strategies. This belief is evidenced by the "arms race" undertaken by certain financial firms to co-locate with exchange servers. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to validate and quantify this assumption in a continuous double auction market with a single exchange similar to the New York Stock Exchange. It is not feasible to conduct this exploration with historical data in which trader identity and location are not reported. Accordingly, we investigate the relationship between latency of access to order book information and profitability of trading strategies exploiting that information with an agent-based interactive discrete event simulation in which thousands of agents pursue archetypal trading strategies. We introduce experimental traders pursuing a low-latency order book imbalance (OBI) strategy in a controlled manner across thousands of simulated trading days, and analyze OBI trader profit while varying distance (latency) from the exchange. Our experiments support that latency is inversely related to profit for the OBI traders, but more interestingly show that latency rank, rather than absolute magnitude, is the key factor in allocating returns among agents pursuing a similar strategy.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Jun. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2006.08682v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, "The Importance of Low Latency to Order Book Imbalance Trading Strategies," authors David Byrd, Sruthi Palaparthi, Maria Hybinette, and Tucker Hybinette Balch delve into the pervasive assumption that low latency access to an exchange is crucial for the profitability of high-frequency trading strategies. This belief is substantiated by the competitive "arms race" among financial firms to co-locate with exchange servers. The researchers set out to validate and quantify this assumption in a continuous double auction market resembling the New York Stock Exchange. This task was not feasible with historical data lacking trader identity and location information. Therefore, the authors employed an agent-based interactive discrete event simulation involving thousands of agents executing various trading strategies to explore the relationship between latency of access to order book information and trading strategy profitability. Specifically, they introduced experimental traders pursuing a low-latency order book imbalance (OBI) strategy over numerous simulated trading days. Through their analysis of OBI trader profits while varying their distance (latency) from the exchange, the researchers found that latency was inversely correlated with profit for OBI traders. Furthermore, their experiments revealed an intriguing insight: while latency played a significant role in determining profits for OBI traders, it was the latency rank rather than its absolute magnitude that proved pivotal in allocating returns among agents employing similar strategies. This finding underscores the nuanced interplay between latency levels and trading strategy effectiveness in high-frequency trading environments. Overall, this study sheds light on the critical importance of low latency in optimizing order book imbalance trading strategies within modern financial markets.
Created on 20 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.