Comparative study of the biological activities of the aqueous extracts of two spontaneous plants harvested in the Algerian Sahara
Authors: Rekia Cherif
Abstract: The present study investigates the insecticidal and herbicidal effects of leaf extracts from two plants were harvested in the Northern Algerian Sahara. These are Cleome arabica (Capparaceae) and Pergularia tomentosa (Asclepiadaceae). The efficacy of the extracts from the plants was evaluated by the reflux extraction method. The phytochemical screening of the aqueous extracts of C. arabica shows a remarkable richness in active principles in comparison with the extract of P. tomentosa; including flavonoids, saponosides, glycosides, terpenes, sterols, deoxyose, polyphenols and total alkaloids. The imago of Tribolium confusum treated with aqueous extracts of C. arabica and P. tomentosa at doses of 80% to 100% respectively have mortality rates of 73.33% to 96.67%, and 36.67% to 86.67%. The lethal time 50 (TL50%) of the aqueous extract of C. arabica was estimated about 6.41 days, and 6.94 days for the extract P. tomentosa for the imago of T. confusum. The extracts of P. tomentosa is less toxic than the extracts of C. arabica. The allelopathic potentials of C. arabica and P. tomentosa tested on germination of the seeds of a weed Dactyloctenium aegyptium (Poaceae) and two cultivated species, including Hordeumvulgare and Triticumdurum (Poaceae), show that the inhibitory effect of extracts of C. arabica is very highly significant. It manifests itself in the growth of the aerial and underground part of the H. vulgar and T. durum. The inhibition rate is more than 84.44% for D. aegyptium seeds treated with the different concentrations. The inhibition rates range from 75.56% to 91.11% for T. durum wheat irrigate at 80% to 100%, but are only 55.56% to 77.78% for barley seeds treated with the same concentrations (80% to 100%).
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.