Distributed Weighted Min-Cut in Nearly-Optimal Time
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The minimum-weight cut (min-cut) is a fundamental metric for assessing network connectivity strength.
- Traditional methods efficiently compute min-cut in a sequential setting, but distributed networks lack efficient autonomous computation methods without compromising input structure constraints or output quality.
- Existing algorithms in the CONGEST model provide nearly-optimal time complexities but only offer $(1+\epsilon)$-approximations.
- A recent algorithm developed by Ghaffari, Nowicki, and Thorup offers an exact $\tilde O(n^{0.8}D^{0.2} + n^{0.9})$-time solution limited to simple networks without weights and parallel edges.
- There is a gap in addressing min-cut computation for weighted networks, with the best-known bound at $\tilde O(n)$ according to Daga et al.'s work presented at STOC'19.
- A new algorithm introduced in the paper offers an exact $\tilde O(\sqrt n + D)$-time solution tailored for computing min-cuts on weighted networks, surpassing previous algorithms designed for simple networks and matching known lower bounds up to polylogarithmic factors in time complexity.
- The novel approach combines two distinct tree-decompositions and a structural theorem that enhances efficiency and simplifies computational processes.
- Authored by Michal Dory, Yuval Efron, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay, and Danupon Nanongkai under the title "Distributed Weighted Min-Cut in Nearly-Optimal Time," this paper represents a significant advancement in distributed network analysis methodologies.
Authors: Michal Dory, Yuval Efron, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay, Danupon Nanongkai
Abstract: Minimum-weight cut (min-cut) is a basic measure of a network's connectivity strength. While the min-cut can be computed efficiently in the sequential setting [Karger STOC'96], there was no efficient way for a distributed network to compute its own min-cut without limiting the input structure or dropping the output quality: In the standard CONGEST model, existing algorithms with nearly-optimal time (e.g. [Ghaffari, Kuhn, DISC'13; Nanongkai, Su, DISC'14]) can guarantee a solution that is $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation at best while the exact $\tilde O(n^{0.8}D^{0.2} + n^{0.9})$-time algorithm [Ghaffari, Nowicki, Thorup, SODA'20] works only on $\textit{simple}$ networks (no weights and no parallel edges). Throughout, $n$ and $D$ denote the network's number of vertices and hop-diameter, respectively. For the weighted case, the best bound was $\tilde O(n)$ [Daga et al. STOC'19]. In this paper, we provide an $\textit{exact}$ $\tilde O(\sqrt n + D)$-time algorithm for computing min-cut on $\textit{weighted}$ networks. Our result improves even the previous algorithm that works only on simple networks. Its time complexity matches the known lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. At the heart of our algorithm are a combination of two kinds of tree-decompositions and a novel structural theorem that generalizes a theorem in Mukhopadhyay-Nanongkai [STOC'20] and, in turn, helps simplify their algorithms.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.