A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper

AI-generated keywords: Norm Emergence Normative MAS Norm Synthesis Ostrom's Principles Agent Participation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Norm emergence in multiagent systems (MAS)
  • Implicit norms in traditional MAS
  • Normative MAS involves explicit norms
  • Emergence of norms in normative MAS
  • Agents' involvement in norm synthesis
  • Ostrom's eight principles and collective decision-making processes
  • Framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS
  • Agent participation and influence over governing norms
  • Incorporating agent input into the process
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Andreasa Morris-Martin, Marina De Vos, Julian Padget

16 pages, 2 figures, pre-print for International Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems (COINE), co-located with AAMAS 2020

Abstract: Norm emergence is typically studied in the context of multiagent systems (MAS) where norms are implicit, and participating agents use simplistic decision-making mechanisms. These implicit norms are usually unconsciously shared and adopted through agent interaction. A norm is deemed to have emerged when a threshold or predetermined percentage of agents follow the "norm". Conversely, in normative MAS, norms are typically explicit and agents deliberately share norms through communication or are informed about norms by an authority, following which an agent decides whether to adopt the norm or not. The decision to adopt a norm by the agent can happen immediately after recognition or when an applicable situation arises. In this paper, we make the case that, similarly, a norm has emerged in a normative MAS when a percentage of agents adopt the norm. Furthermore, we posit that agents themselves can and should be involved in norm synthesis, and hence influence the norms governing the MAS, in line with Ostrom's eight principles. Consequently, we put forward a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS, that allows participating agents to propose/request changes to the normative system, while special-purpose synthesizer agents formulate new norms or revisions in response to these requests. Synthesizers must collectively agree that the new norm or norm revision should proceed, and then finally be approved by an "Oracle". The normative system is then modified to incorporate the norm.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Apr. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2004.02575v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper" by Andreasa Morris-Martin, Marina De Vos, and Julian Padget explores the concept of norm emergence in the context of multiagent systems (MAS). In traditional MAS, norms are implicit and agents use simplistic decision-making mechanisms. These implicit norms are unconsciously shared and adopted through agent interaction. A norm is considered to have emerged when a predetermined percentage or threshold of agents follow it. In contrast, normative MAS involves explicit norms that are deliberately shared through communication or informed by an authority. Agents in normative MAS decide whether to adopt a norm based on recognition or when a relevant situation arises. The authors argue that a norm can be considered to have emerged in a normative MAS when a certain percentage of agents adopt it. The paper further proposes that agents themselves should be involved in the process of norm synthesis, allowing them to influence the norms governing the MAS. This approach aligns with Ostrom's eight principles, which emphasize the importance of involving individuals in collective decision-making processes. To facilitate this involvement, the authors present a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS. According to this framework, participating agents can propose or request changes to the existing normative system. Special-purpose synthesizer agents then formulate new norms or revisions in response to these requests. Once approved, the normative system is modified to incorporate the new norm. Overall, this paper highlights the significance of involving agents in norm synthesis within a normative MAS and presents a framework that allows for agent participation and influence over governing norms. By considering both implicit and explicit norms and incorporating agent input into the process, this framework contributes to understanding how norms emerge and evolve within multiagent systems.
Created on 25 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.