The paper titled "A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper" by Andreasa Morris-Martin, Marina De Vos, and Julian Padget explores the concept of norm emergence in the context of multiagent systems (MAS). In traditional MAS, norms are implicit and agents use simplistic decision-making mechanisms. These implicit norms are unconsciously shared and adopted through agent interaction. A norm is considered to have emerged when a predetermined percentage or threshold of agents follow it. In contrast, normative MAS involves explicit norms that are deliberately shared through communication or informed by an authority. Agents in normative MAS decide whether to adopt a norm based on recognition or when a relevant situation arises. The authors argue that a norm can be considered to have emerged in a normative MAS when a certain percentage of agents adopt it. The paper further proposes that agents themselves should be involved in the process of norm synthesis, allowing them to influence the norms governing the MAS. This approach aligns with Ostrom's eight principles, which emphasize the importance of involving individuals in collective decision-making processes. To facilitate this involvement, the authors present a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS. According to this framework, participating agents can propose or request changes to the existing normative system. Special-purpose synthesizer agents then formulate new norms or revisions in response to these requests. Once approved, the normative system is modified to incorporate the new norm. Overall, this paper highlights the significance of involving agents in norm synthesis within a normative MAS and presents a framework that allows for agent participation and influence over governing norms. By considering both implicit and explicit norms and incorporating agent input into the process, this framework contributes to understanding how norms emerge and evolve within multiagent systems.
- - Norm emergence in multiagent systems (MAS)
- - Implicit norms in traditional MAS
- - Normative MAS involves explicit norms
- - Emergence of norms in normative MAS
- - Agents' involvement in norm synthesis
- - Ostrom's eight principles and collective decision-making processes
- - Framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS
- - Agent participation and influence over governing norms
- - Incorporating agent input into the process
Norm emergence in multiagent systems (MAS) refers to the development of rules or expectations that agents follow when interacting with each other. Implicit norms in traditional MAS are unspoken rules that agents naturally adopt during their interactions. Normative MAS involves explicit norms, which are clearly defined rules that agents must follow. The emergence of norms in normative MAS is the process by which these explicit norms come into existence. Agents' involvement in norm synthesis means that they play a role in creating and shaping these norms. Ostrom's eight principles and collective decision-making processes provide guidelines for how groups of agents can make decisions together. A framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS is a structure or plan that helps facilitate the development of these rules. Agent participation and influence over governing norms means that agents have a say in deciding what rules should be followed. Incorporating agent input into the process means taking into account the ideas and opinions of individual agents when creating or changing norms."
Exploring Norm Emergence in Multiagent Systems
In recent years, multiagent systems (MAS) have become increasingly popular for a variety of applications. MAS involve multiple autonomous agents that interact with each other and the environment to achieve a common goal. However, traditional MAS rely on implicit norms that are unconsciously shared and adopted through agent interaction. In contrast, normative MAS involve explicit norms that are deliberately shared through communication or informed by an authority. A norm is considered to have emerged when a predetermined percentage or threshold of agents follow it.
In their paper titled “A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper”, Andreasa Morris-Martin, Marina De Vos, and Julian Padget explore the concept of norm emergence in the context of normative MAS. They argue that involving agents themselves in the process of norm synthesis allows them to influence the norms governing the MAS—an approach which aligns with Ostrom's eight principles emphasizing individual involvement in collective decision-making processes. To facilitate this involvement, they present a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS which incorporates both implicit and explicit norms as well as agent input into the process.
Implicit vs Explicit Norms
Traditional multiagent systems rely on implicit norms—rules or conventions adopted by agents without conscious awareness or deliberate choice—which are unconsciously shared and adopted through agent interaction over time. In contrast, normative MAS involve explicit norms—norms that are deliberately communicated between agents or informed by an external authority such as legislation or policy documents—that must be consciously accepted by participating agents before they can take effect. A norm is considered to have emerged when a predetermined percentage or threshold of agents follow it regardless of whether it is implicit or explicit in nature.
The Significance Of Agent Involvement
Morris-Martin et al argue that involving agents themselves in the process of norm synthesis allows them to influence the governing norms within a multiagent system (MAS). This approach aligns with Ostrom's eight principles which emphasize individual involvement in collective decision-making processes such as those found within complex adaptive systems like social networks and markets where decisions made at one level can affect outcomes at another level due to interdependencies among participants' actions and beliefs about others' behavior patterns . By allowing individuals to participate directly in shaping their own environment rather than relying solely on external authorities such as governments or corporations to do so , this approach encourages greater autonomy , responsibility , creativity , collaboration , innovation , adaptability , resilience , sustainability , fairness and equity .
A Framework For The Emergence Of Norms Within A Normative Mas
To facilitate agent participation and influence over governing norms within a normative mas, Morris-Martin et al propose a framework for norm emergence based on four stages: 1) Proposal/Request; 2) Synthesis; 3) Approval; 4) Modification/Implementation . During stage one (Proposal/Request), participating agents can propose changes to existing rulesets while special purpose synthesizer agents receive requests from these proposing entities during stage two (Synthesis). These synthesizers then formulate new rulesets based on received requests during stage three (Approval). Finally during stage four (Modification/Implementation), approved rulesets are incorporated into existing ones thus modifying overall system behavior accordingly .
Conclusion
Overall this paper highlights how incorporating agent input into rule formation processes contributes significantly towards understanding how emergent behaviors arise from interactions between autonomous entities operating under different sets of constraints . By considering both implicit and explicit forms of governance along with involving individuals directly in collective decision making processes via its proposed framework for norm emergence within normative mas environments Morris Martin et al provide valuable insight into how complex adaptive systems evolve over time .