Finding the Optimal Vocabulary Size for Neural Machine Translation

AI-generated keywords: Neural Machine Translation Vocabulary Size Classification Task Autoregressive Framework Imbalanced Class Distributions

AI-generated Key Points

  • Thamme Gowda and Jonathan May study neural machine translation (NMT) as a classification task within an autoregressive framework.
  • Classifiers perform better when trained on balanced class distributions, but the Zipfian nature of languages introduces imbalanced classes in NMT.
  • The researchers use two key statistics, Divergence (D) and Frequency at 95th% Class Rank (F95%), to quantify imbalance in class distributions.
  • D measures deviation from a balanced distribution using Earth Mover Distance, while F95% identifies the least frequency in the 95th percentile of most frequent classes.
  • Lower D values indicate more balanced class distribution, reducing errors due to class bias.
  • F95% helps quantify the minimum number of training examples required for specific percentiles of classes while filtering out noise.
  • The study explores the impact of various vocabulary sizes on NMT performance across multiple languages with varying data sizes.
  • Insights are provided into why certain vocabulary sizes yield superior results and how imbalanced class distributions affect NMT outcomes.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Thamme Gowda, Jonathan May

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We cast neural machine translation (NMT) as a classification task in an autoregressive setting and analyze the limitations of both classification and autoregression components. Classifiers are known to perform better with balanced class distributions during training. Since the Zipfian nature of languages causes imbalanced classes, we explore its effect on NMT. We analyze the effect of various vocabulary sizes on NMT performance on multiple languages with many data sizes, and reveal an explanation for why certain vocabulary sizes are better than others.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Apr. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2004.02334v2

In their study titled "Finding the Optimal Vocabulary Size for Neural Machine Translation," Thamme Gowda and Jonathan May delve into the intricacies of neural machine translation (NMT) by framing it as a classification task within an autoregressive framework. They meticulously analyze the limitations posed by both classification and autoregression components, noting that classifiers typically perform better when trained on balanced class distributions. However, the Zipfian nature of languages introduces imbalanced classes, prompting the researchers to investigate its impact on NMT performance. To quantify this imbalance, Gowda and May employ two key statistics: Divergence (D) and Frequency at 95th% Class Rank (F95%). D measures the deviation from a balanced distribution using a simplified version of Earth Mover Distance. By calculating the total cost of moving probability mass between classes, they determine the imbalance measure D for K class distributions based on observed probabilities in training data. A lower value of D signifies a more balanced class distribution, reducing the likelihood of errors due to class bias. F95% identifies the least frequency in the 95th percentile of most frequent classes. This metric offers a straightforward approach to quantifying the minimum number of training examples required for specific percentiles of classes while filtering out noise from lower percentiles. Furthermore, Gowda and May explore the effect of various vocabulary sizes on NMT performance across multiple languages with varying data sizes. Through their analysis, they provide insights into why certain vocabulary sizes yield superior results compared to others. By systematically examining these factors, the researchers aim to enhance our understanding of how imbalanced class distributions impact NMT outcomes and offer valuable guidance for optimizing vocabulary size selection in neural machine translation systems.
Created on 29 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.