Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimization

AI-generated keywords: Circle loss pair similarity optimization deep feature learning flexible optimization convergence target

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Introduces the Circle loss, a novel approach to optimize pair similarity in deep feature learning
  • Goal is to maximize within-class similarity ($s_p$) and minimize between-class similarity ($s_n$)
  • Existing loss functions embed $s_n$ and $s_p$ into similarity pairs and aim to reduce their difference $(s_n-s_p)$ but are inflexible due to equal penalty strength for all scores
  • Authors propose re-weighting each score based on its deviation from the optimum, resulting in the Circle loss with a circular decision boundary
  • Offers a unified formula for learning with class-level labels and pair-wise labels
  • Provides more flexible optimization by emphasizing less-optimized scores as convergence targets
  • Experimental results show outperformance of state-of-the-art methods on tasks like face recognition, person re-identification, and fine-grained image retrieval datasets
  • Presents an innovative perspective on optimizing pair similarity in deep feature learning through the Circle loss, offering improved flexibility and convergence targets compared to existing methods
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yifan Sun, Changmao Cheng, Yuhan Zhang, Chi Zhang, Liang Zheng, Zhongdao Wang, Yichen Wei

Abstract: This paper provides a pair similarity optimization viewpoint on deep feature learning, aiming to maximize the within-class similarity $s_p$ and minimize the between-class similarity $s_n$. We find a majority of loss functions, including the triplet loss and the softmax plus cross-entropy loss, embed $s_n$ and $s_p$ into similarity pairs and seek to reduce $(s_n-s_p)$. Such an optimization manner is inflexible, because the penalty strength on every single similarity score is restricted to be equal. Our intuition is that if a similarity score deviates far from the optimum, it should be emphasized. To this end, we simply re-weight each similarity to highlight the less-optimized similarity scores. It results in a Circle loss, which is named due to its circular decision boundary. The Circle loss has a unified formula for two elemental deep feature learning approaches, i.e. learning with class-level labels and pair-wise labels. Analytically, we show that the Circle loss offers a more flexible optimization approach towards a more definite convergence target, compared with the loss functions optimizing $(s_n-s_p)$. Experimentally, we demonstrate the superiority of the Circle loss on a variety of deep feature learning tasks. On face recognition, person re-identification, as well as several fine-grained image retrieval datasets, the achieved performance is on par with the state of the art.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Feb. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2002.10857v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This paper introduces the Circle loss, a novel approach to optimize pair similarity in deep feature learning. The goal is to maximize within-class similarity ($s_p$) and minimize between-class similarity ($s_n$). Existing loss functions embed $s_n$ and $s_p$ into similarity pairs and aim to reduce their difference $(s_n-s_p)$ but are inflexible due to equal penalty strength for all scores. To address this limitation, the authors propose re-weighting each score based on its deviation from the optimum, resulting in the Circle loss with a circular decision boundary. It offers a unified formula for two fundamental approaches: learning with class-level labels and pair-wise labels. Analytically, it provides a more flexible optimization by emphasizing less-optimized scores as convergence targets. Experimental results show that it outperforms state-of-the-art methods on various tasks like face recognition, person re-identification, and fine-grained image retrieval datasets. In conclusion, this paper presents an innovative perspective on optimizing pair similarity in deep feature learning through the Circle loss which offers improved flexibility and convergence targets compared to existing methods.
Created on 05 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.