The neonatal sepsis is diminished by cervical vagus nerve stimulation and tracked non-invasively by ECG: a preliminary report in the piglet model
AI-generated Key Points
- Study aimed to investigate the effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on inflammatory response induced by high dose of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in neonatal piglets
- Relationship between vagus nerve electroneurogram (VENG) and heart rate variability (HRV) inflammatory index evaluated
- Electrodes attached to left vagal nerve, ECG and blood pressure recorded throughout experiment
- Piglets administered high dose of LPS intravenously, one group received VNS before and after injection, other group did not receive VNS
- Arterial blood samples collected every 15 minutes post-LPS injection to measure blood gas, metabolites, and inflammatory cytokines
- Results showed potent inflammatory response to LPS injection with peak levels of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, and IL-8 occurring between 45 and 90 minutes post-injection
- VNS treatment significantly reduced systemic inflammatory response induced by LPS across various measured cytokines
- HRV index accurately tracked temporal profile of cytokine levels and changes in VENG activity, suggesting HRV monitoring can effectively detect and track inflammation in piglets
- Key findings: HRV inflammatory index applies across species prenatally and postnatally; performs well at different degrees of sepsis induced by nanogram or milligram doses of LPS; VNS paradigm effectively suppresses LPS-induced inflammation even at high doses.
- Potential for early postnatal VNS as countermeasure against sepsis emphasized, importance of HRV monitoring for early detection and tracking of sepsis highlighted.
- Future studies proposed to explore mathematical properties of VENG activity in relation to HRV and investigate deep learning approaches for predicting HRV features from VENG data.
Authors: Aude Castel, Patrick Burns, Colin Wakefield, Keven. J. Jean, Yael S. Frank, Mingju Cao, Andre Desrochers, Gilles Fecteau, Christophe Faure, Christophe L. Herry, Martin G. Frasch
Abstract: An electrocardiogram (ECG)-derived heart rate variability (HRV) index reliably tracks the inflammatory response induced by low-dose lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in near-term sheep fetuses. We evaluated the effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on vagus nerve electroneurogram (VENG) and the systemic inflammatory response induced by a high dose of LPS in neonatal piglets to mimic late-onset neonatal sepsis. We tested if our HRV inflammatory index tracks inflammation in piglets and its relationship to VENG. Following anesthesia, electrodes were attached to the left vagal nerve; ECG and blood pressure (BP) were recorded throughout the experiment. Following baseline, the piglets were administered LPS as 2mg/kg IV bolus. In the VNS treated piglet, the vagus nerve was stimulated for 10 minutes prior to and 10 min after the injection of LPS. In both groups, every 15 min post LPS, the arterial blood sample was drawn for blood gas, metabolites, and inflammatory cytokines. At the end of the experiment, the piglets were euthanized. BP and HRV measures were calculated. The piglets developed a potent inflammatory response to the LPS injection with TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6 and IL-8 peaking between 45 and 90 min post-injection. VNS diminished the LPS-induced systemic inflammatory response varying across the measured cytokines from two to ten-fold. The HRV index tracked accurately the temporal profile of cytokines and VENG changes. This novel model allows manipulating and tracking neonatal sepsis: The HRV inflammatory index 1) applies across species pre- and postnatally and 2) performs well at different degrees of sepsis (i.e., nanogram and milligram doses of LPS); 3) the present VNS paradigm effectively suppresses LPS-induced inflammation, even at high doses of LPS. The potential of early postnatal VNS to counteract sepsis and of HRV monitoring to early detect and track it deserve further study.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.