PRINCE: Provider-side Interpretability with Counterfactual Explanations in Recommender Systems

AI-generated keywords: Interpretable explanations

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Interpretable explanations are crucial for establishing user trust in recommender systems and other machine learning models
  • PRINCE is a provider-side mechanism that generates tangible explanations for end-users
  • PRINCE identifies the minimal set of actions required to alter a recommendation using an optimal algorithm and random walks over dynamic graphs
  • Experimental results show that PRINCE offers more concise explanations compared to intuitive baselines
  • PRINCE produces scrutable, actionable, and succinct explanations by leveraging counterfactual evidence, a user's own actions, and minimal sets respectively
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Azin Ghazimatin, Oana Balalau, Rishiraj Saha Roy, Gerhard Weikum

WSDM 2019, 9 pages

Abstract: Interpretable explanations for recommender systems and other machine learning models are crucial to gain user trust. Prior works that have focused on paths connecting users and items in a heterogeneous network have several limitations, such as discovering relationships rather than true explanations, or disregarding other users' privacy. In this work, we take a fresh perspective, and present PRINCE: a provider-side mechanism to produce tangible explanations for end-users, where an explanation is defined to be a set of minimal actions performed by the user that, if removed, changes the recommendation to a different item. Given a recommendation, PRINCE uses a polynomial-time optimal algorithm for finding this minimal set of a user's actions from an exponential search space, based on random walks over dynamic graphs. Experiments on two real-world datasets show that PRINCE provides more compact explanations than intuitive baselines, and insights from a crowdsourced user-study demonstrate the viability of such action-based explanations. We thus posit that PRINCE produces scrutable, actionable, and concise explanations, owing to its use of counterfactual evidence, a user's own actions, and minimal sets, respectively.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Nov. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1911.08378v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , Interpretable explanations are crucial for establishing user trust in recommender systems and other machine learning models. However, previous approaches have fallen short in providing true explanations or addressing privacy concerns. To address these limitations, this study introduces PRINCE: a provider-side mechanism that generates tangible explanations for end-users. These explanations consist of minimal actions taken by the user that would result in a different recommendation being made if removed. PRINCE utilizes an optimal algorithm to navigate through a search space using random walks over dynamic graphs to identify the minimal set of actions required to alter a recommendation. Experimental results from real-world datasets demonstrate that PRINCE offers more concise explanations compared to intuitive baselines. A crowdsourced user-study also confirms the practicality and effectiveness of action-based explanations provided by PRINCE. The key strengths of PRINCE lie in its ability to produce scrutable, actionable, and succinct explanations by leveraging counterfactual evidence, a user's own actions, and minimal sets respectively. By focusing on individual user actions' impact on recommendations, PRINCE enhances transparency and trustworthiness in machine learning models while addressing the need for interpretable explanations in complex systems like recommender algorithms.
Created on 23 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.