Accurate Layerwise Interpretable Competence Estimation

AI-generated keywords: Competence Estimation ALICE Score Model Confidence Trust Score Real-world Applications

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address the problem of estimating machine learning performance in real-world scenarios
  • Focus on examining, understanding, and predicting pointwise competence of classification models
  • Establish a statistically rigorous definition of competence that considers distributional uncertainty, data uncertainty, and model uncertainty
  • Introduce the ALICE Score as a pointwise competence estimator for any classifier
  • ALICE performs well in challenging situations such as class-imbalanced datasets, out-of-distribution datasets, and poorly trained models
  • Compare ALICE with state-of-the-art confidence estimators like model confidence and Trust Score
  • Experiments show significant improvements in competence prediction using ALICE
  • Provides valuable insights into accurately estimating machine learning performance in real-world applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Vickram Rajendran, William LeVine

Proceedings of the 33rd Conference in Neural Information Processing Systems (2019), 15 pages

Abstract: Estimating machine learning performance 'in the wild' is both an important and unsolved problem. In this paper, we seek to examine, understand, and predict the pointwise competence of classification models. Our contributions are twofold: First, we establish a statistically rigorous definition of competence that generalizes the common notion of classifier confidence; second, we present the ALICE (Accurate Layerwise Interpretable Competence Estimation) Score, a pointwise competence estimator for any classifier. By considering distributional, data, and model uncertainty, ALICE empirically shows accurate competence estimation in common failure situations such as class-imbalanced datasets, out-of-distribution datasets, and poorly trained models. Our contributions allow us to accurately predict the competence of any classification model given any input and error function. We compare our score with state-of-the-art confidence estimators such as model confidence and Trust Score, and show significant improvements in competence prediction over these methods on datasets such as DIGITS, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Oct. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1910.11363v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper "Accurate Layerwise Interpretable Competence Estimation," authors Vickram Rajendran and William LeVine address the challenging problem of estimating machine learning performance in real-world scenarios. They focus specifically on examining, understanding, and predicting the pointwise competence of classification models. The authors make two significant contributions in their research. First, they establish a statistically rigorous definition of competence that goes beyond the common notion of classifier confidence. This definition takes into account various factors such as distributional uncertainty, data uncertainty, and model uncertainty. By considering these uncertainties, the authors aim to provide a more accurate estimation of competence. Secondly, they introduce the ALICE (Accurate Layerwise Interpretable Competence Estimation) Score which serves as a pointwise competence estimator for any classifier. ALICE incorporates the established definition of competence and leverages it to predict the competence of classification models given any input and error function. The authors demonstrate that ALICE performs well even in challenging situations such as class-imbalanced datasets, out-of-distribution datasets, and poorly trained models. To validate their approach, the authors compare ALICE with state-of-the-art confidence estimators like model confidence and Trust Score. Their experiments on popular datasets such as DIGITS, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 show significant improvements in competence prediction using ALICE. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into accurately estimating machine learning performance by introducing a comprehensive definition of competence and an effective pointwise competence estimator. The proposed approach shows promising results in various challenging scenarios commonly encountered in real-world applications.
Created on 20 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.