Beating the House: Identifying Inefficiencies in Sports Betting Markets
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Inefficient markets provide opportunities for investors to consistently outperform the market
- A study was conducted on sports betting markets to demonstrate the existence of inefficiencies
- A betting algorithm was developed that generates above-market returns for various sports leagues including NFL, NBA, NCAAF, NCAAB, and WNBA
- A unique dataset of bets was collected and examined to formulate a successful betting strategy
- A non-parametric win probability model was created to identify positive expected value situations
- The recent repeal of the federal ban on sports betting by the United States Supreme Court has opened up new possibilities in the industry
- The findings of this study are important for individual bettors and industry professionals looking to capitalize on these inefficiencies
- By leveraging the algorithm and win probability model, investors can potentially achieve higher returns compared to traditional market investments
- This research serves as a valuable resource for individuals seeking an edge in the evolving sports betting industry.
Authors: Sathya Ramesh, Ragib Mostofa, Marco Bornstein, John Dobelman
Abstract: Inefficient markets allow investors to consistently outperform the market. To demonstrate that inefficiencies exist in sports betting markets, we created a betting algorithm that generates above market returns for the NFL, NBA, NCAAF, NCAAB, and WNBA betting markets. To formulate our betting strategy, we collected and examined a novel dataset of bets, and created a non-parametric win probability model to find positive expected value situations. As the United States Supreme Court has recently repealed the federal ban on sports betting, research on sports betting markets is increasingly relevant for the growing sports betting industry.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.