Development of Computational Thinking in High School Students: A Case Study in Chile

AI-generated keywords: Computational Thinking

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on development of computational thinking in high school students in Chile
  • Most efforts to incorporate computational thinking have targeted early years of schooling using visual tools like Scratch and Alice
  • Limited research on development of computational thinking in later years of school without prior formal preparation
  • Study aims to provide evidence of effectiveness of teaching programming in C++ to develop computational thinking skills among high school students
  • Test administered before and after voluntary C++ programming workshop
  • Results show significant improvement in computational thinking at the end of the workshop
  • Students with lower initial computational thinking tend to drop out more frequently
  • Tenth-grade students obtained lower final scores compared to eleventh and twelfth-grade students
  • Teaching a low-level programming language like C++ can be beneficial for developing computational thinking skills among high school students
  • Presence of entry barriers associated with learning such languages highlighted, further research and interventions may be needed
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Felipe González, Claudia López, Carlos Castro

in Spanish. 37th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)

Abstract: Most efforts to incorporate computational thinking in K-12 education have been focused on students in their first cycles of school education and have used visual tools, such as Scratch and Alice. Fewer research projects have studied the development of computational thinking in students in their last years of school, who usually have not had early formal preparation to acquire these skills. This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of teaching programming in C++ (a low-level language) to develop computational thinking in high school students in Chile. By applying a test before and after a voluntary C ++ programming workshop, the results show a significant improvement in computational thinking at the end of the workshop. However, we also observed that there was a tendency to drop out of the workshop among students with lower levels of initial computational thinking. Tenth-grade students obtained lower final scores than eleventh and twelfth-grade students. These results indicate that teaching a low-level programming language is useful, but it has high entry-barriers.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Oct. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1910.06080v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study, conducted by Felipe González, Claudia López, and Carlos Castro, focuses on the development of computational thinking in high school students in Chile. While most efforts to incorporate computational thinking in K-12 education have targeted students in their early years of schooling using visual tools like Scratch and Alice, there has been limited research on the development of computational thinking in students in their later years of school who may not have had prior formal preparation. The study aims to provide evidence of the effectiveness of teaching programming in C++ (a low-level language) to develop computational thinking skills among high school students. To assess this, a test was administered before and after a voluntary C++ programming workshop. The results indicate a significant improvement in computational thinking at the end of the workshop. However, it was observed that students with lower levels of initial computational thinking tended to drop out of the workshop more frequently. Additionally, tenth-grade students obtained lower final scores compared to eleventh and twelfth-grade students. These findings suggest that teaching a low-level programming language like C++ can be beneficial for developing computational thinking skills among high school students. However, it also highlights the presence of entry barriers associated with learning such languages. Further research and interventions may be needed to address these barriers and ensure equal access to computational thinking education for all high school students.
Created on 27 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.