Verbal Autopsy in Civil Registration and Vital Statistics: The Symptom-Cause Information Archive
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The burden of disease is important for public health interventions
- Calculating the burden of disease requires cause of death information
- Verbal autopsy is a method to determine cause of death through interviews
- Verbal autopsy plays an increasingly important role as civil registration and vital statistics systems improve in developing countries
- Machine-based algorithms are needed to automate cause assignment from verbal autopsy data
- A global symptom-cause archive is proposed to facilitate the development of machine-based algorithms
- The archive would be used for training and validation of automated cause assignment algorithms
- The establishment of such an archive aims to improve comparability and accuracy in cause assignment
Authors: Samuel J. Clark, Martin W. Bratschi, Philip Setel, Carla Abouzahr, Don de Savigny, Zehang Li, Tyler McCormick, Peter Byass, Daniel Chandramohan
Abstract: The burden of disease is fundamental to understanding, prioritizing, and monitoring public health interventions. Cause of death is required to calculate the burden of disease, but in many parts of the developing world deaths are neither detected nor given a cause. Verbal autopsy is a feasible way of assigning a cause to a death based on an interview with those who cared for the person who died. As civil registration and vital statistics systems improve in the developing world, verbal autopsy is playing and increasingly important role in providing information about cause of death and the burden of disease. This note motivates the creation of a global symptom-cause archive containing reference deaths with both a verbal autopsy and a cause assigned through an independent mechanism. This archive could provide training and validation data for refining, developing, and testing machine-based algorithms to automate cause assignment from verbal autopsy data. This, in turn, would improve the comparability of machine-assigned causes and provide a means to fine-tune individual cause assignment within specific contexts.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.