Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1909.04107v1

In their study titled "Taxing dissent: The Impact of a Social Media Tax in Uganda," authors Levi Boxell and Zachary Steinert-Threlkeld investigate the effects of a daily tax on social media use as a tool for suppressing political dissent. Using a synthetic control framework, the researchers estimate that this tax led to a 13 percent decrease in the number of georeferenced Twitter users in Uganda. Interestingly, they find that the impact of the tax was more pronounced among poorer and less frequent users. Despite the overall decline in Twitter use, the study reveals an unexpected outcome: tweets referencing collective action increased by 31 percent, while observed protests rose by 47 percent. These findings suggest that taxing social media use may not be an effective strategy for reducing political dissent. This research sheds light on the potential limitations of using financial barriers to suppress online expression and highlights how such measures can inadvertently fuel collective action and protests. The study's results have important implications for policymakers considering similar approaches to control political discourse through social media taxation. They demonstrate that taxes on social media usage are unlikely to be successful at curbing political dissent and may even have unintended consequences such as encouraging collective action and protest activity.

• - Study titled "Taxing dissent: The Impact of a Social Media Tax in Uganda"
• - Investigates effects of daily tax on social media use as tool for suppressing political dissent
• - Tax led to 13% decrease in georeferenced Twitter users in Uganda
• - Impact more pronounced among poorer and less frequent users
• - Unexpected outcome: tweets referencing collective action increased by 31%, observed protests rose by 47%
• - Taxing social media use may not be effective strategy for reducing political dissent
• - Financial barriers can inadvertently fuel collective action and protests
• - Important implications for policymakers considering similar approaches to control political discourse through social media taxation

A study called "Taxing dissent: The Impact of a Social Media Tax in Uganda" looked at how a tax on social media affected people's use of it for political dissent. The tax made 13% fewer people in Uganda use Twitter to share their location. This effect was stronger for poorer and less frequent users. Surprisingly, the number of tweets about working together increased by 31%, and there were 47% more protests. This means that taxing social media might not be a good way to stop people from expressing their political opinions. Policymakers should think carefully before using taxes to control what people say online. Definitions- Tax: Money that people have to pay to the government. - Social media: Websites and apps where people can share things like pictures, videos, and messages with others. - Political dissent: When someone disagrees with or criticizes the government or its actions. - Georeferenced: Showing or sharing your location on a map. - Collective action: When many people work together towards a common goal. - Protests: Public demonstrations where people show their disagreement or disapproval of something.

Taxing Dissent: The Impact of a Social Media Tax in Uganda

In recent years, governments around the world have increasingly used taxes on social media use as a tool for suppressing political dissent. In their study titled "Taxing dissent: The Impact of a Social Media Tax in Uganda," authors Levi Boxell and Zachary Steinert-Threlkeld investigate the effects of such taxes by examining the impact of a daily tax on social media use in Uganda. Using a synthetic control framework, the researchers estimate that this tax led to a 13 percent decrease in the number of georeferenced Twitter users in Uganda.

Decrease Among Poorer and Less Frequent Users

Interestingly, they find that the impact of the tax was more pronounced among poorer and less frequent users. This suggests that financial barriers may be an effective way to limit access to online expression among those with fewer resources.

Unexpected Outcome: Increase in Tweets Referencing Collective Action

Despite the overall decline in Twitter use, however, there was an unexpected outcome: tweets referencing collective action increased by 31 percent, while observed protests rose by 47 percent. These findings suggest that taxing social media use may not be an effective strategy for reducing political dissent after all – it could even have unintended consequences such as encouraging collective action and protest activity.

Implications for Policymakers

The study's results have important implications for policymakers considering similar approaches to control political discourse through social media taxation. They demonstrate that taxes on social media usage are unlikely to be successful at curbing political dissent and may even have unintended consequences such as encouraging collective action and protest activity. It is clear from this research that financial barriers alone are not enough to suppress online expression or reduce political dissent – other measures must be taken if governments wish to achieve these goals effectively. Overall, Boxell and Steinert-Threlkeld’s research sheds light on the potential limitations of using financial barriers to suppress online expression and highlights how such measures can inadvertently fuel collective action and protests rather than dampen them down as intended. This study provides valuable insights into how policies aimed at controlling digital speech can backfire if not implemented carefully – something which policymakers should keep in mind when considering similar strategies going forward.