Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1909.01095v1

In the paper titled "A Legal Definition of AI," Jonas Schuett discusses the challenges faced by policy makers when attempting to regulate artificial intelligence (AI). The author emphasizes that before implementing regulations, it is crucial to establish a clear definition of what constitutes AI. However, legal definitions of AI differ significantly from those in other disciplines and are often considered working definitions. One key issue highlighted in the paper is the need for courts to accurately determine whether a specific system should be classified as AI under the law. To address this challenge, the author explores how policy makers can define the material scope of AI regulations. They argue against using the term "artificial intelligence" for regulatory purposes due to the lack of a universally accepted definition that meets legal requirements. Instead, Schuett suggests adopting a risk-based approach and defining specific designs, use cases, or capabilities that pose potential risks. By focusing on these aspects rather than attempting to create an all-encompassing definition of AI, policy makers can better address the unique challenges and complexities associated with regulating this rapidly evolving technology. The primary goal of this paper is to provide guidance and insights for policy makers involved in developing AI regulations. By offering alternative approaches to defining and regulating AI, Schuett aims to contribute towards more effective policies that balance innovation and societal concerns while ensuring safety standards are met.

• - Establishing a clear definition of AI is crucial before implementing regulations
• - Legal definitions of AI differ significantly from those in other disciplines
• - Courts face challenges in accurately determining whether a system should be classified as AI under the law
• - Using the term "artificial intelligence" for regulatory purposes is not recommended due to the lack of a universally accepted definition
• - A risk-based approach can be adopted to define specific designs, use cases, or capabilities that pose potential risks
• - Focusing on specific aspects rather than creating an all-encompassing definition of AI can better address the challenges of regulating this rapidly evolving technology
• - The paper aims to provide guidance and insights for policy makers involved in developing AI regulations.

AI stands for artificial intelligence, which is a type of technology that can think and learn like humans. It is important to have a clear definition of AI before making rules about it. Different areas have different definitions of AI, so it can be hard for courts to decide if something is considered AI or not. Instead of using the term "artificial intelligence," it might be better to focus on specific parts or abilities of AI that could be risky. This paper wants to help people who make rules about AI understand how to do it better." Definitions- Artificial Intelligence (AI): A type of technology that can think and learn like humans. - Regulations: Rules and laws that are made by governments or organizations. - Definition: The meaning or explanation of something. - Disciplines: Different areas or fields of study. - Courts: Places where legal cases are decided by judges. - Universally accepted: Agreed upon by everyone in the world. - Risk-based approach: A way of thinking about things based on how much danger they might cause. - Designs, use cases, or capabilities: Different parts or abilities of a technology. - Policy makers: People who create rules and laws for governments or organizations.

A Legal Definition of AI: Exploring the Challenges Faced by Policy Makers

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a major area of interest for policy makers due to its potential to revolutionize many aspects of our lives. However, before regulations can be implemented, it is essential to establish a clear definition of what constitutes AI. In his paper titled “A Legal Definition of AI”, Jonas Schuett discusses the challenges faced by policy makers when attempting to regulate this rapidly evolving technology.

Understanding the Differences Between Legal and Non-Legal Definitions

Schuett emphasizes that legal definitions of AI differ significantly from those in other disciplines and are often considered working definitions. He explains that while non-legal definitions focus on technical capabilities such as machine learning or natural language processing, legal definitions must take into account various social and ethical considerations. This means that any definition used for regulatory purposes must meet certain criteria such as being precise enough to accurately determine whether a specific system should be classified as AI under the law.

Exploring Alternative Approaches to Defining and Regulating AI

The author argues against using the term "artificial intelligence" for regulatory purposes due to the lack of a universally accepted definition that meets legal requirements. Instead, Schuett suggests adopting a risk-based approach and defining specific designs, use cases, or capabilities that pose potential risks. By focusing on these aspects rather than attempting to create an all-encompassing definition of AI, policy makers can better address the unique challenges and complexities associated with regulating this technology.

Conclusion

The primary goal of this paper is to provide guidance and insights for policy makers involved in developing AI regulations. By offering alternative approaches to defining and regulating AI, Schuett aims to contribute towards more effective policies that balance innovation and societal concerns while ensuring safety standards are met.