A Benchmark of Visual Storytelling in Social Media

Authors: Gonçalo Marcelino, David Semedo, André Mourão, Saverio Blasi, Marta Mrak, João Magalhães

To appear in ACM ICMR 2019

Abstract: Media editors in the newsroom are constantly pressed to provide a "like-being there" coverage of live events. Social media provides a disorganised collection of images and videos that media professionals need to grasp before publishing their latest news updated. Automated news visual storyline editing with social media content can be very challenging, as it not only entails the task of finding the right content but also making sure that news content evolves coherently over time. To tackle these issues, this paper proposes a benchmark for assessing social media visual storylines. The SocialStories benchmark, comprised by total of 40 curated stories covering sports and cultural events, provides the experimental setup and introduces novel quantitative metrics to perform a rigorous evaluation of visual storytelling with social media data.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Aug. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1908.03505v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 29 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.