Dueling Posterior Sampling for Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning

AI-generated keywords: preference-based reinforcement learning formal frameworks Dueling Posterior Sampling Bayesian framework credit assignment problem

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Preference-based reinforcement learning (RL) focuses on agents receiving preferences rather than absolute feedback
  • Dueling Posterior Sampling (DPS) is introduced by a team of researchers including Ellen R. Novoseller, Yanan Sui, Yisong Yue, and Joel W. Burdick
  • DPS combines preference-based bandit learning and posterior sampling in RL to learn system dynamics and utility function
  • DPS handles trajectory-level preferences using preference-based posterior sampling
  • Bayesian framework is used for credit assignment translating user preferences into a posterior distribution over state/action reward models
  • An asymptotic no-regret rate is established for DPS using a Bayesian logistic regression credit assignment model
  • Empirical evaluations show competitive performance of DPS against existing baselines in practical scenarios
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ellen R. Novoseller (California Institute of Technology), Yanan Sui (Stanford University), Yisong Yue (California Institute of Technology), Joel W. Burdick (California Institute of Technology)

8 pages before references and Appendix; 35 pages total; 3 figures; 1 table

Abstract: In preference-based reinforcement learning (RL), an agent interacts with the environment while receiving preferences instead of absolute feedback. While there is increasing research activity in preference-based RL, the design of formal frameworks that admit tractable theoretical analysis remains an open challenge. Building upon ideas from preference-based bandit learning and posterior sampling in RL, we present Dueling Posterior Sampling (DPS), which employs preference-based posterior sampling to learn both the system dynamics and the underlying utility function that governs the user's preferences. Because preference feedback is provided on trajectories rather than individual state/action pairs, we develop a Bayesian approach to solving the credit assignment problem, translating user preferences to a posterior distribution over state/action reward models. We prove an asymptotic no-regret rate for DPS with a Bayesian logistic regression credit assignment model; to our knowledge, this is the first regret guarantee for preference-based RL. We also discuss possible avenues for extending this proof methodology to analyze other credit assignment models. Finally, we evaluate the approach empirically, showing competitive performance against existing baselines.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Aug. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1908.01289v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of preference-based reinforcement learning (RL), where agents receive preferences rather than absolute feedback while interacting with the environment, there is a growing interest in developing formal frameworks that allow for tractable theoretical analysis. Addressing this challenge, a team of researchers including Ellen R. Novoseller, Yanan Sui, Yisong Yue, and Joel W. Burdick from institutions such as California Institute of Technology and Stanford University introduce Dueling Posterior Sampling (DPS). This innovative approach builds upon concepts from preference-based bandit learning and posterior sampling in RL to enable the agent to learn both the system dynamics and the underlying utility function governing user preferences. Unlike traditional RL settings where feedback is provided on individual state/action pairs, DPS leverages preference-based posterior sampling to handle trajectory-level preferences. By employing a Bayesian framework to tackle the credit assignment problem, user preferences are translated into a posterior distribution over state/action reward models. The researchers establish an asymptotic no-regret rate for DPS using a Bayesian logistic regression credit assignment model, marking a significant advancement as it represents the first regret guarantee for preference-based RL. Furthermore, the team explores potential avenues for extending their proof methodology to analyze alternative credit assignment models in future research endeavors. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that DPS exhibits competitive performance when compared against existing baselines in practical scenarios. With 35 pages in total including figures and tables, this work sheds light on cutting-edge developments in preference-based RL and sets a foundation for further advancements in this field.
Created on 24 May. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.