Global AI Ethics: A Review of the Social Impacts and Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Social Impacts Ethical Implications Global Scale Cultural Contexts

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Current analyses of AI are predominantly focused on perspectives held in the U.S., resulting in a lack of research and understanding outside of this region, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Social impacts of AI vary significantly depending on geographical setting and are influenced by local cultural and social contexts.
  • Recent research shows that AI-driven technologies tend to exacerbate social inequality, particularly among historically marginalized groups, not only in the U.S. but globally.
  • Rigorous ethnographic research is needed to gain a deeper understanding of the social impacts of AI worldwide.
  • Global, on-the-ground research is necessary to identify AI systems that may amplify social inequality and mitigate potential harms.
  • Responsible development, implementation, monitoring, and regulation of AI technologies require expanded research efforts beyond Western Europe and the U.S., as well as increased awareness regarding how AI can impact different societies around the world.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Alexa Hagerty, Igor Rubinov

Abstract: The ethical implications and social impacts of artificial intelligence have become topics of compelling interest to industry, researchers in academia, and the public. However, current analyses of AI in a global context are biased toward perspectives held in the U.S., and limited by a lack of research, especially outside the U.S. and Western Europe. This article summarizes the key findings of a literature review of recent social science scholarship on the social impacts of AI and related technologies in five global regions. Our team of social science researchers reviewed more than 800 academic journal articles and monographs in over a dozen languages. Our review of the literature suggests that AI is likely to have markedly different social impacts depending on geographical setting. Likewise, perceptions and understandings of AI are likely to be profoundly shaped by local cultural and social context. Recent research in U.S. settings demonstrates that AI-driven technologies have a pattern of entrenching social divides and exacerbating social inequality, particularly among historically-marginalized groups. Our literature review indicates that this pattern exists on a global scale, and suggests that low- and middle-income countries may be more vulnerable to the negative social impacts of AI and less likely to benefit from the attendant gains. We call for rigorous ethnographic research to better understand the social impacts of AI around the world. Global, on-the-ground research is particularly critical to identify AI systems that may amplify social inequality in order to mitigate potential harms. Deeper understanding of the social impacts of AI in diverse social settings is a necessary precursor to the development, implementation, and monitoring of responsible and beneficial AI technologies, and forms the basis for meaningful regulation of these technologies.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Jul. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1907.07892v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This article provides a comprehensive review of the social impacts and ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) on a global scale. The authors highlight that current analyses of AI are predominantly focused on perspectives held in the U.S., resulting in a lack of research and understanding outside of this region, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. To address this gap, the authors conducted an extensive literature review, reviewing over 800 academic journal articles and monographs in multiple languages. The findings from the literature review suggest that the social impacts of AI vary significantly depending on geographical setting. Moreover, perceptions and understandings of AI are heavily influenced by local cultural and social contexts. Recent research conducted in U.S. settings demonstrates a concerning pattern where AI-driven technologies tend to exacerbate social inequality, particularly among historically marginalized groups. Importantly, the literature review indicates that this pattern is not limited to the U.S., but exists on a global scale. The authors call for rigorous ethnographic research to gain a deeper understanding of the social impacts of AI worldwide. They emphasize the need for global, on-the-ground research to identify AI systems that may amplify social inequality in order to mitigate potential harms. Such research is crucial for informing responsible development, implementation, and monitoring of beneficial AI technologies as well as meaningful regulation of these technologies. In conclusion, this article highlights the urgent need for expanded research efforts beyond Western Europe and the U.S., as well as increased awareness regarding how AI can impact different societies around the world. By gaining a deeper understanding of these social impacts within diverse contexts, stakeholders can work towards developing ethical frameworks and regulations that ensure responsible deployment and equitable benefits from AI technologies globally.
Created on 02 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.