Dynamics of cluster-forming hub-filament systems: The case of the high-mass star-forming complex Monoceros R2
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- High-mass stars and star clusters are common in hub-filament systems
- Monoceros R2 is a nearby hub-filament system ideal for study
- Researchers investigated morphology, stability, and dynamical properties of Monoceros R2
- Used 13CO and C18O observations, as well as H2 column density maps from Herschel dust emission observations
- Identified filamentary network within the system
- Main filaments have line masses of 30–100 Msun/pc and show signs of fragmentation
- Secondary filaments have line masses of 12–60 Msun/pc and exhibit sporadic fragmentation
- Most main filaments are trans-critical according to Ostriker's hydrostatic filament model
- Majority of secondary filaments are roughly trans-critical regardless of non-thermal motions
- Main filaments have mass accretion rates into the hub ranging from 10^(-4) to 10^(-3) Msun/pc
- Secondary filaments accrete into main ones at a rate of 0.1–0.4 times 10^(-4) Msun/pc
- Main filaments extend into the hub with increasing velocity gradients indicating gas acceleration
- Mass doubling time of the hub is approximately 2.5 million years, ten times larger than free fall time
- Monoceros R2 is a dynamically old region comparable with chemical age of HII region within it
- Main filaments inside the hub exhibit ring or spiral-like morphology with rotation and infall motions
Authors: S. P. Trevino-Morales, A. Fuente, A. Sanchez-Monge, J. Kainulainen, P. Didelon, S. Suri, N. Schneider, J. Ballesteros-Paredes, Y. -N. Lee, P. Hennebelle, P. Pilleri, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, C. Kramer, S. Garcia-Burillo, A. Luna, J. R. Goicoechea, P. Tremblin, S. Geen
Abstract: High-mass stars and star clusters commonly form within hub-filament systems. Monoceros R2, harbors one of the closest such systems, making it an excellent target for case studies. We investigate the morphology, stability and dynamical properties of the hub-filament system on basis of 13CO and C18O observations obtained with the IRAM-30m telescope and H2 column density maps derived from Herschel dust emission observations. We identified the filamentary network and characterized the individual filaments as either main (converging into the hub) or secondary (converging to a main filament) filaments. The main filaments have line masses of 30-100 Msun/pc and show signs of fragmentation. The secondary filaments have line masses of 12-60 Msun/pc and show fragmentation only sporadically. In the context of Ostriker's hydrostatic filament model, the main filaments are thermally super-critical. If non-thermal motions are included, most of them are trans-critical. Most of the secondary filaments are roughly trans-critical regardless of whether non-thermal motions are included or not. From the main filaments, we estimate a mass accretion rate of 10(-4)-10(-3) Msun/pc into the hub. The secondary filaments accrete into the main filaments with a rate of 0.1-0.4x10(-4) Msun/pc. The main filaments extend into the hub. Their velocity gradients increase towards the hub, suggesting acceleration of the gas. We estimate that with the observed infall velocity, the mass-doubling time of the hub is ~2.5 Myr, ten times larger than the free-fall time, suggesting a dynamically old region. These timescales are comparable with the chemical age of the HII region. Inside the hub, the main filaments show a ring- or a spiral-like morphology that exhibits rotation and infall motions. One possible explanation for the morphology is that gas is falling into the central cluster following a spiral-like pattern.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.