Network Slicing Management Technique for Local 5G Micro-Operator Deployments

AI-generated keywords: Network Slicing 5G Micro-Operator Local Networks 3GPP Vertical Sectors

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Local 5G networks cater to specific requirements of different vertical sectors
  • Locally deployed 5G networks, known as micro-operator networks, can serve multiple verticals and tenants in a location
  • Network slicing is crucial for efficiently serving multiple verticals with distinct network requirements
  • The paper focuses on implementing, orchestrating, and managing network slicing in local 5G micro-operator deployments
  • It addresses closed, open, and mixed customer groups within these deployments
  • A descriptive technique leveraging different network slicing management functionalities is proposed
  • The technique is based on the configuration type of the network slice instance for each scenario
  • Effective network slicing management is essential for designing local 5G networks that serve diverse customer groups across various verticals.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Idris Badmus, Marja Matinmikko-Blue, Jaspreet Singh Walia

Conference in Proc. of 2019 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS) At Oulu, Finland

Abstract: Local 5G networks are expected to emerge to serve different vertical sectors specific requirements. These networks can be deployed by traditional mobile network operators or entrant local operators. With a large number of verticals with different service requirements, while considering the network deployment cost in a single local area, it will not be economically feasible to deploy separate networks for each vertical. Thus, locally deployed 5G networks (aka micro operator networks) that can serve multiple verticals with multiple tenants in a location have gained increasing attention. Network slicing will enable a 5G micro-operator network to efficiently serve the multiple verticals and their tenants with different network requirements. This paper addresses how network slicing management functions can be used to implement, orchestrate and manage network slicing in different deployments of a local 5G micro-operator including the serving of closed, open and mixed customer groups. The paper proposes a descriptive technique by which different network slicing management functionalities defined by 3GPP can be used in coordination to create, orchestrate and manage network slicing for different deployment scenarios of a micro-operator. This is based on the network slice instance configuration type that can exist for each scenario. A network slice formation sequence is developed for the closed micro operator network to illustrate the tasks of the management functions. The results indicate that network slicing management plays a key role in designing local 5G networks that can serve different customer groups in the verticals.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Jun. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1906.10993v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Network Slicing Management Technique for Local 5G Micro-Operator Deployments" explores the emergence of local 5G networks that cater to the specific requirements of different vertical sectors. These networks can be established by traditional mobile network operators or new local operators. Considering the high number of verticals with diverse service needs, it is not economically feasible to deploy separate networks for each vertical in a single area. To address this challenge, locally deployed 5G networks, also known as micro-operator networks, have gained attention. These networks have the capability to serve multiple verticals and tenants in a particular location. The implementation of network slicing plays a crucial role in enabling a 5G micro-operator network to efficiently serve these multiple verticals with their distinct network requirements. This paper focuses on how network slicing management functions can be utilized to implement, orchestrate, and manage network slicing in various deployments of a local 5G micro-operator. It specifically addresses the serving of closed, open, and mixed customer groups within these deployments. The authors propose a descriptive technique that leverages different network slicing management functionalities defined by 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) to create, orchestrate, and manage network slicing for different deployment scenarios of a micro-operator. This technique is based on the configuration type of the network slice instance that exists for each scenario. To illustrate the tasks performed by the management functions in a closed micro operator network, the paper presents a sequence for network slice formation. The results indicate that effective network slicing management is essential in designing local 5G networks capable of serving diverse customer groups within various verticals. Overall, this study highlights the significance of network slicing management in facilitating the development and operation of local 5G networks that meet the specific requirements of different customer groups across various vertical sectors.
Created on 14 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.