Building a Production Model for Retrieval-Based Chatbots

AI-generated keywords: Retrieval-Based Chatbots Production Model Dual Encoder Architecture Whitelist Generation Human Evaluation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address the task of response suggestion in human-computer conversation systems
  • Little attention has been given to practicality in a production setting
  • Dual encoder architecture proposed for rapid inference and scalability
  • Two methods for generating whitelists introduced and compared
  • Comprehensive analysis of model and whitelists conducted
  • Experimental results demonstrate production-quality performance through offline metrics and human evaluation
  • Study provides key lessons about conversation modeling in practice
  • Emphasizes importance of considering practicality when developing conversation systems
  • Contributes to building more efficient and reliable retrieval-based chatbots for real-world applications
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Kyle Swanson, Lili Yu, Christopher Fox, Jeremy Wohlwend, Tao Lei

Abstract: Response suggestion is an important task for building human-computer conversation systems. Recent approaches to conversation modeling have introduced new model architectures with impressive results, but relatively little attention has been paid to whether these models would be practical in a production setting. In this paper, we describe the unique challenges of building a production retrieval-based conversation system, which selects outputs from a whitelist of candidate responses. To address these challenges, we propose a dual encoder architecture which performs rapid inference and scales well with the size of the whitelist. We also introduce and compare two methods for generating whitelists, and we carry out a comprehensive analysis of the model and whitelists. Experimental results on a large, proprietary help desk chat dataset, including both offline metrics and a human evaluation, indicate production-quality performance and illustrate key lessons about conversation modeling in practice.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Jun. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1906.03209v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Building a Production Model for Retrieval-Based Chatbots," authors Kyle Swanson, Lili Yu, Christopher Fox, Jeremy Wohlwend and Tao Lei address the task of response suggestion in human-computer conversation systems. While recent approaches to conversation modeling have shown impressive results with new model architectures, little attention has been given to their practicality in a production setting. To overcome these challenges, the authors propose a dual encoder architecture that enables rapid inference and scales effectively with the size of the whitelist. Additionally, they introduce and compare two methods for generating whitelists and conduct a comprehensive analysis of both the model and whitelists. The experimental results on a large proprietary help desk chat dataset demonstrate production-quality performance through offline metrics and human evaluation. This research provides key lessons about conversation modeling in practice and emphasizes the importance of considering practicality when developing conversation systems. By addressing these challenges and providing insights into effective model architectures and whitelist generation methods, this study contributes to building more efficient and reliable retrieval-based chatbots for real-world applications.
Created on 26 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.