Funding Adjustments in Equity Linear Products

AI-generated keywords: Funding Adjustments Equity Linear Products Option Pricing Valuation Adjustments Financial Contracts

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Stefania Gabrielli, Andrea Pallavicini, and Stefano Scoleri emphasize the importance of incorporating credit and liquidity effects, funding costs, collateral procedures, hedging strategies, and taxes into option prices for accurate profitability assessment.
  • They propose a general pricing framework that includes valuation adjustments and develop simple evaluation formulae for total return equity swaps.
  • The authors focus on utilizing stock lending and borrowing as a hedging strategy in their case study.
  • By considering funding adjustments in equity linear products, the authors aim to provide a comprehensive analysis that enhances understanding of complexities in option pricing and financial contract production costs.
  • Their research contributes valuable insights to quantitative finance by offering practical solutions for assessing profitability and managing risks associated with financial instruments.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Stefania Gabrielli, Andrea Pallavicini, Stefano Scoleri

arXiv: 1906.02561v1 - DOI (q-fin.MF)
18 pages, 6 figures

Abstract: Valuation adjustments are nowadays a common practice to include credit and liquidity effects in option pricing. Funding costs arising from collateral procedures, hedging strategies and taxes are added to option prices to take into account the production cost of financial contracts so that a profitability analysis can be reliably assessed. In particular, when dealing with linear products, we need a precise evaluation of such contributions since bid-ask spreads may be very tight. In this paper we start from a general pricing framework inclusive of valuation adjustments to derive simple evaluation formulae for the relevant case of total return equity swaps when stock lending and borrowing is adopted as hedging strategy.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jun. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1906.02561v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Funding Adjustments in Equity Linear Products," authors Stefania Gabrielli, Andrea Pallavicini, and Stefano Scoleri delve into the common practice of valuation adjustments in option pricing. They highlight the importance of incorporating credit and liquidity effects, as well as funding costs stemming from collateral procedures, hedging strategies, and taxes, into option prices to accurately assess the profitability of financial contracts. The authors propose a general pricing framework that includes valuation adjustments and proceed to develop simple evaluation formulae for total return equity swaps. In this specific case study, they focus on how stock lending and borrowing can be utilized as a hedging strategy. By considering these funding adjustments in equity linear products, the authors aim to provide a comprehensive analysis that enhances the understanding of the complexities involved in option pricing and financial contract production costs. Through their research, Gabrielli, Pallavicini, and Scoleri contribute valuable insights to the field of quantitative finance by offering practical solutions for assessing profitability and managing risks associated with such financial instruments.
Created on 18 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.