Planning Gamification Strategies based on User Characteristics and DM: A Gender-based Case Study

AI-generated keywords: Gamification Educational Experiences User Characteristics Data Mining Gender

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Gamification frameworks enhance educational experiences
  • Existing frameworks often lack flexibility for individual user characteristics like gender
  • Researchers conducted a study on planning gamification strategies based on user characteristics and data mining
  • Study aimed to provide tailored game element recommendations for educators
  • Survey with 733 participants revealed four key types of game elements: Objectives, Levels, Progress, and Choice are crucial in designing effective gamified tasks
  • Gender-specific preferences were identified: female participants preferred rules linking Objectives with Progress, Badges, and Information; male participants preferred rules associating Objectives with Progress, Renovation, and Choice
  • Actionable recommendations were provided on integrating game elements into educational scenarios to enhance engagement and learning outcomes
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Armando M. Toda, Wilk Oliveira, Lei Shi, Ig Ibert Bittencourt, Seiji Isotani, Alexandra Cristea

International Conference on Educational Data Mining 2019 (Accepted as Short Paper)

Abstract: Gamification frameworks can aid in gamification planning for education. Most frameworks, however, do not provide ways to select, relate or recommend how to use game elements, to gamify a certain educational task. Instead, most provide a "one-size-fits-all" approach covering all learners, without considering different user characteristics, such as gender. Therefore, this work aims to adopt a data-driven approach to provide a set of game element recommendations, based on user preferences, that could be used by teachers and instructors to gamify learning activities. We analysed data from a novel survey of 733 people (male=569 and female=164), collecting information about user preferences regarding game elements. Our results suggest that the most important rules were based on four (out of nineteen) types of game elements: Objectives, Levels, Progress and Choice. From the perspective of user gender, for the female sample, the most interesting rule associated Objectives with Progress, Badges and Information (confidence=0.97), whilst the most interesting rule for the male sample associated also Objectives with Progress, Renovation and Choice (confidence=0.94). These rules and our descriptive analysis provides recommendations on how game elements can be used in educational scenarios.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 May. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1905.09146v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Gamification frameworks have shown promise in enhancing educational experiences. However, many existing frameworks lack the flexibility to cater to individual user characteristics, such as gender. In response to this gap, a team of researchers including Armando M. Toda, Wilk Oliveira, Lei Shi, Ig Ibert Bittencourt, Seiji Isotani, and Alexandra Cristea conducted a study focusing on planning gamification strategies based on user characteristics and data mining. The team aimed to provide tailored game element recommendations for educators looking to gamify learning activities. Through a comprehensive survey involving 733 participants (569 male and 164 female), the researchers gathered valuable insights into user preferences regarding game elements. Their analysis revealed that four key types of game elements - Objectives, Levels, Progress, and Choice - emerged as crucial components in designing effective gamified educational tasks. Furthermore, the study delved into gender-specific preferences within the surveyed sample. For female participants, the most compelling rule linked Objectives with Progress, Badges, and Information with high confidence (0.97). On the other hand, male participants showed a strong preference for rules associating Objectives with Progress, Renovation,and Choice (confidence=0.94). By leveraging these findings and conducting descriptive analyses,the research team provided actionable recommendations on how game elements can be strategically integrated into educational scenarios to enhance engagement and learning outcomes.This innovative approach underscores the importance of considering user characteristics like gender when designing gamification strategies for education.The study's insights offer valuable guidance for educators seeking to leverage gamification effectively in their teaching practices.
Created on 19 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.