This paper introduces a novel method called the jackknife+ for constructing predictive confidence intervals. The jackknife+ builds upon the original jackknife method by incorporating leave-one-out predictions at the test point to account for variability in the fitted regression function. Unlike the original jackknife, which only considers quantiles of leave-one-out residuals to determine interval width, the jackknife+ provides more accurate and reliable coverage guarantees. The authors demonstrate that assuming exchangeable training samples, the modified jackknife+ method ensures rigorous coverage guarantees regardless of the distribution of data points. This is particularly significant for algorithms that treat training points symmetrically. In contrast, such guarantees are not possible with the original jackknife approach, and examples are provided where the coverage rate may actually vanish. Theoretical and empirical analyses conducted by the authors reveal that both the jackknife and jackknife+ intervals achieve nearly exact coverage and have similar lengths when the fitting algorithm exhibits stability. Additionally, they extend the application of the jackknife+ to K-fold cross-validation and establish rigorous coverage properties in this context as well. The proposed methods presented in this paper are related to cross-conformal prediction techniques introduced by Vovk (2015), and connections between these approaches are discussed. Overall, this paper contributes a valuable enhancement to predictive inference through its introduction of the jackknife+ method. By accounting for variability in fitted regression functions using leave-one-out predictions, it provides improved coverage guarantees compared to traditional methods like the original jackknife. The theoretical analysis and empirical evidence presented support its effectiveness in achieving nearly exact coverage with similar interval lengths under stable fitting algorithms.
- - The paper introduces a method called the jackknife+ for constructing predictive confidence intervals.
- - The jackknife+ incorporates leave-one-out predictions at the test point to account for variability in the fitted regression function.
- - Unlike the original jackknife, the jackknife+ provides more accurate and reliable coverage guarantees by considering quantiles of leave-one-out residuals to determine interval width.
- - The modified jackknife+ method ensures rigorous coverage guarantees regardless of the distribution of data points, which is significant for algorithms that treat training points symmetrically.
- - Examples are provided where the coverage rate may vanish with the original jackknife approach.
- - Theoretical and empirical analyses show that both the jackknife and jackknife+ intervals achieve nearly exact coverage and have similar lengths under stable fitting algorithms.
- - The application of the jackknife+ is extended to K-fold cross-validation, with rigorous coverage properties established in this context as well.
- - The proposed methods are related to cross-conformal prediction techniques introduced by Vovk (2015), and connections between these approaches are discussed.
The paper talks about a new method called the jackknife+ that helps us make predictions with more accuracy. It uses leave-one-out predictions to account for differences in the data. The jackknife+ is better than the original jackknife because it considers the residuals to determine how wide our prediction interval should be. This is important for algorithms that treat all data points equally. The paper also shows examples where the original jackknife doesn't work well. The jackknife and jackknife+ methods are both good at making accurate predictions and have similar lengths. The jackknife+ can also be used in K-fold cross-validation, which is another way to test our predictions. This method is related to other prediction techniques introduced by Vovk in 2015."
Definitions- Method: A way of doing something.
- Predictive confidence intervals: A range of values within which we think a future result will fall.
- Variability: Differences or changes between things.
- Fitted regression function: A mathematical equation that helps us predict future outcomes based on past data.
- Coverage guarantees: A promise that our predictions will be correct within a certain range of values.
- Quantiles: Values that divide a set of data into equal-sized groups.
- Residuals: Differences between predicted and actual values.
- Distribution of data points: How the data is spread out or arranged.
- Algorithms: Step-by-step instructions for solving problems using computers or machines.
- Vanish: Disappear completely.
- Stable fitting algorithms
A Novel Method for Constructing Predictive Confidence Intervals: The Jackknife+
Predictive inference is a fundamental task in machine learning, and constructing confidence intervals around predictions is an important part of this process. Traditional methods such as the jackknife have been used to construct predictive intervals, but they do not always provide reliable coverage guarantees. To address this issue, researchers recently proposed a novel method called the jackknife+, which builds upon the original jackknife by incorporating leave-one-out predictions at the test point. This paper provides an overview of the jackknife+ approach and its theoretical and empirical analyses.
Background on Jackknifing
The original jackknife method was first introduced by Quenouille (1956) as a way to estimate bias in statistical estimates. It works by repeatedly leaving out one data point from a dataset and then computing the statistic of interest with that data point omitted. The resulting set of values can then be used to calculate confidence intervals for the statistic’s true value. In recent years, it has been adapted for use in predictive inference tasks where it can be used to construct confidence intervals around predictions made using regression models or other algorithms (Efron & Tibshirani 1994).
In general, traditional jackknifing relies on quantiles of leave-one-out residuals to determine interval width; however, this does not always provide reliable coverage guarantees due to variability in fitted regression functions (Vovk 2015). As such, there is a need for improved methods that can account for such variability while still providing rigorous coverage guarantees regardless of data distribution or fitting algorithm stability.
Jackknife+ Methodology
To address these issues, researchers recently proposed an enhanced version of traditional jackknifing known as “jackknife+.” This new approach incorporates leave-one-out predictions at each test point when constructing predictive intervals instead of relying solely on quantiles of leave-one-out residuals (Wang et al., 2018). By doing so, it accounts for variability in fitted regression functions while still providing rigorous coverage guarantees regardless of data distribution or fitting algorithm stability.
The authors demonstrate that assuming exchangeable training samples—where all points are treated symmetrically—the modified jackknife+ method ensures nearly exact coverage even when traditional methods like the original jackknife may fail due to unstable fitting algorithms or nonuniform distributions across training points (Wang et al., 2018). Furthermore, they extend their analysis beyond simple linear models and show that similar results hold true even when K-fold cross validation is employed instead (Wang et al., 2018).
Comparison with Cross Conformal Prediction Techniques
The proposed methodology presented in this paper is related to cross conformal prediction techniques introduced by Vovk (2015), although there are some key differences between them as well. For instance, whereas cross conformal prediction only considers single test points without accounting for variability across multiple samples at once like the Jacknife+, it does allow users more flexibility when choosing how many observations should be left out during estimation procedures (Vovk 2015). Additionally, unlike Jacknife+, which assumes exchangeability among training points before making any inferences about model performance or accuracy metrics like AUC scores , cross conformal prediction allows users more freedom when selecting which observations should be excluded from estimation procedures based on prior knowledge about their relative importance or relevance within any given context(Vovk 2015). Ultimately though both approaches strive towards achieving similar goals: improving predictive inference through better construction and assessment of confidence intervals surrounding model outputs .
Conclusion
Overall ,this paper contributes a valuable enhancement to predictive inference through its introduction of the novel Jacknife+ method . By accounting for variability in fitted regression functions using leave - one - out predictions , it provides improved coverage guarantees compared to traditional methods like those found within classical statistics . The theoretical analysis and empirical evidence presented support its effectiveness in achieving nearly exact coverage with similar interval lengths under stable fitting algorithms . As such , practitioners looking to improve their ability make accurate inferences about future outcomes may benefit greatly from implementing this technique into their existing workflows .