Are All Layers Created Equal?

AI-generated keywords: Deep learning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Understanding how neural networks learn and generalize is a key focus in deep learning research
  • Large, over-parameterized networks challenge traditional notions of uniform convergence and learnability
  • Study by Chiyuan Zhang, Samy Bengio, and Yoram Singer investigates layer-wise functional structure of deep neural networks
  • Layers can be classified as "robust" or "critical"
  • Critical layers are sensitive to changes and resetting them can negatively impact model performance
  • Robust layers show resilience to resets and remain stable throughout training
  • The study highlights the complexity of deep neural networks and challenges simplistic approaches when studying generalization
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Chiyuan Zhang, Samy Bengio, Yoram Singer

Abstract: Understanding learning and generalization of deep architectures has been a major research objective in the recent years with notable theoretical progress. A main focal point of generalization studies stems from the success of excessively large networks which defy the classical wisdom of uniform convergence and learnability. We study empirically the layer-wise functional structure of over-parameterized deep models. We provide evidence for the heterogeneous characteristic of layers. To do so, we introduce the notion of (post training) re-initialization and re-randomization robustness. We show that layers can be categorized into either "robust" or "critical". In contrast to critical layers, resetting the robust layers to their initial value has no negative consequence, and in many cases they barely change throughout training. Our study provides further evidence that mere parameter counting or norm accounting is too coarse in studying generalization of deep models.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Feb. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1902.01996v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In the realm of deep learning, understanding how neural networks learn and generalize has been a key focus of research in recent years. The success of large, over-parameterized networks has challenged traditional notions of uniform convergence and learnability, prompting researchers to delve deeper into the inner workings of these complex models. In their study titled "Are All Layers Created Equal? ", authors Chiyuan Zhang, Samy Bengio, and Yoram Singer empirically investigate the layer-wise functional structure of deep neural networks. They introduce the concept of post-training re-initialization and re-randomization robustness to explore the characteristics of different layers within these models. Through their research, they uncover evidence that layers can be classified as either "robust" or "critical". Critical layers are sensitive to changes and resetting them to their initial values can have negative consequences on model performance. In contrast, robust layers show resilience to such resets and often remain stable throughout training. This distinction between robust and critical layers highlights the complexity inherent in deep neural networks and challenges simplistic approaches like parameter counting or norm accounting when studying generalization in these models. By shedding light on the heterogeneous nature of layers within deep architectures, this study contributes valuable insights towards unraveling the mysteries of learning and generalization in deep learning systems.
Created on 10 Sep. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.