On Network Science and Mutual Information for Explaining Deep Neural Networks

AI-generated keywords: Network Science Mutual Information Deep Neural Networks NIF (Neural Information Flow) Feature Attributions

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Paper introduces a novel approach to interpreting deep learning models
  • Integration of mutual information with network science principles to explore information flow in feedforward networks
  • Accurately approximating mutual information enables quantification of information exchange between neurons
  • Introduction of NIF (Neural Information Flow) technique for encoding and analyzing information flow within deep learning models
  • NIF provides valuable insights into internal workings and detailed feature attributions of deep learning models
  • Enhances understanding, transparency, and interpretability of deep neural networks
  • Significant implications for advancing machine learning field and optimizing deep learning algorithms
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Brian Davis, Umang Bhatt, Kartikeya Bhardwaj, Radu Marculescu, José M. F. Moura

ICASSP 2020 (shorter version appeared at AAAI-19 Workshop on Network Interpretability for Deep Learning)

Abstract: In this paper, we present a new approach to interpret deep learning models. By coupling mutual information with network science, we explore how information flows through feedforward networks. We show that efficiently approximating mutual information allows us to create an information measure that quantifies how much information flows between any two neurons of a deep learning model. To that end, we propose NIF, Neural Information Flow, a technique for codifying information flow that exposes deep learning model internals and provides feature attributions.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Jan. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1901.08557v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper "On Network Science and Mutual Information for Explaining Deep Neural Networks" by Brian Davis, Umang Bhatt, Kartikeya Bhardwaj, Radu Marculescu, and José M. F. Moura introduces a novel approach to interpreting deep learning models. By integrating mutual information with network science principles, the researchers explore the complex pathways of information flow within feedforward networks. Their study demonstrates that accurately approximating mutual information allows for the creation of an information measure that quantifies the amount of information exchanged between any two neurons in a deep learning model. At the core of their work is NIF (Neural Information Flow), a groundbreaking technique designed to encode and analyze information flow within deep learning models. By implementing NIF, researchers can gain valuable insights into the internal workings of these complex systems and obtain detailed feature attributions that shed light on how specific features contribute to model performance. This innovative research not only enhances our understanding of deep neural networks but also provides a practical framework for interpreting and optimizing these models for various applications. The findings presented in this paper have significant implications for advancing the field of machine learning and improving the transparency and interpretability of deep learning algorithms. , , , , and are all important concepts addressed in this research that contribute to our understanding of these complex systems.
Created on 31 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.