Postoperative brain volumes are associated with one-year neurodevelopmental outcome in children with severe congenital heart disease
Authors: Eliane Meuwly, Maria Feldmann, Walter Knirsch, Michael von Rhein, Kelly Payette, Hitendu Dave, Ruth Tuura, Raimund Kottke, Cornelia Hagmann, Beatrice Latal, Andras Jakab
Abstract: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) remain at risk for neurodevelopmental impairment despite improved peri- and intraoperative care. Our prospective cohort study aimed to determine the relationship between perioperative brain volumes and neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates with severe CHD. Pre- and postoperative cerebral MRI was acquired in term born neonates with CHD undergoing neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Brain volumes were measured using an atlas prior based automated method. One-year outcome was assessed with the Bayley-III. CHD infants (n=77) had lower pre- and postoper-ative total and regional brain volumes compared to controls (n=44, all p<0.01). CHD infants had poorer cognitive and motor outcome (p<=0.0001) and a trend towards lower language composite score compared to controls (p=0.06). The total and selected regional postoperative brain volumes predicted cognitive and language outcome (all p<0.04). This association was independent of length of intensive care unit stay for total, cortical, temporal, frontal and cerebellar volumes. In CHD neonates undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, pre- and postoperative brain volumes are reduced, and postoperative brain volumes predict cognitive and language outcome at one year. Reduced cerebral volumes in CHD patients could serve as a biomarker for im-paired outcome.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.