The "Monkey Typing Shakespeare" Problem for Compositions
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Research article titled "The 'Monkey Typing Shakespeare' Problem for Compositions" by Shalosh B. Ekhad and Doron Zeilberger
- Scenario: Given n candies, must consume at least one candy per day
- Range of choices: Eat all on first day to spreading out over n days (1 candy per day)
- 2^(n-1) possible ways to distribute candies in total
- Investigating probability of avoiding three consecutive days with specific minimum quantities of candies consumed
- Algorithms developed and implemented in Maple packages by Ekhad and Zeilberger
- Tools address specific scenario and more general questions
- Study offers insights into probabilistic calculations related to candy consumption patterns
- Contributes to combinatorial mathematics and probability theory understanding
Authors: Shalosh B. Ekhad, Doron Zeilberger
Abstract: Suppose that your mother gave you n candies. You have to eat at least one candy each day. One possibility is to eat all n of them the first day. The other extreme is to make them last n days, and only eat one candy a day. Altogether, you have, famously, 2 to the power n-1 choices. If each such choice is equally likely, what is the probability that you never have three consecutive days, where in the first day you ate at least 2 candies, in the second day you ate at least 5 candies, and in the third day you ate at least 3 candies? This article describes algorithms, fully implemented in two Maple packages, to answer such important questions, and more general ones, of this kind.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.