Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1901.02709v1

Implementing circular economy (CE) principles is increasingly recognized as a crucial approach to achieving sustainable development goals. To support the transition towards more CE practices and monitor their effects, there is a growing need for tools that can assist practitioners, decision-makers, and policy-makers. Circular economy indicators (C-indicators) have been developed in recent years to fulfill this need. However, due to the lack of a single definition of the CE concept, it is essential to understand what these indicators measure in order to use them effectively. This study conducted a systematic literature review, considering both academic and grey literature, to identify 55 sets of C-indicators developed by scholars, consulting companies, and governmental agencies. These indicators serve different purposes, have varying scopes, and can be used in different ways. Inspired by existing taxonomies of eco-design tools and sustainability indicators, the authors propose a classification system for C-indicators that aims to assess, improve, monitor, and communicate the performance of CE practices.

• - Implementing circular economy (CE) principles is crucial for sustainable development goals
• - There is a growing need for tools to support the transition towards CE practices and monitor their effects
• - Circular economy indicators (C-indicators) have been developed to fulfill this need
• - Lack of a single definition of the CE concept makes it important to understand what these indicators measure
• - A systematic literature review identified 55 sets of C-indicators developed by scholars, consulting companies, and governmental agencies
• - These indicators serve different purposes, have varying scopes, and can be used in different ways
• - Authors propose a classification system for C-indicators that aims to assess, improve, monitor, and communicate the performance of CE practices.

Implementing circular economy (CE) principles means using resources efficiently and reducing waste to help protect the environment and make sure we have enough for the future. Sustainable development goals are plans to make the world a better place for everyone, now and in the future. Tools are things we use to help us do a job or solve a problem. Circular economy indicators (C-indicators) are ways to measure how well we are doing at using resources efficiently and reducing waste. Scholars, consulting companies, and governmental agencies have created different sets of C-indicators to help us understand how well we are doing with circular economy practices."

Understanding Circular Economy Indicators for Sustainable Development

The transition to a more sustainable future is becoming increasingly important, and implementing circular economy (CE) principles is seen as a crucial approach to achieving this goal. To support the transition and monitor its effects, there is an increasing need for tools that can assist practitioners, decision-makers, and policy-makers. In recent years, circular economy indicators (C-indicators) have been developed to fulfill this need. However, due to the lack of a single definition of the CE concept, it is essential to understand what these indicators measure in order to use them effectively.

A Systematic Literature Review of C-Indicators

To gain insight into how C-indicators are used in practice and what they measure, a systematic literature review was conducted by researchers from the University of Cambridge's Centre for Industrial Sustainability. The review considered both academic and grey literature sources published between 2000 and 2018 in order to identify 55 sets of C-indicators developed by scholars, consulting companies, and governmental agencies. These indicators serve different purposes such as assessing performance or improving processes; have varying scopes; and can be used in different ways such as monitoring or communicating results.

Classifying C-Indicators

Inspired by existing taxonomies of eco-design tools and sustainability indicators, the authors propose a classification system for C-indicators that aims to assess performance; improve processes; monitor progress; or communicate results related to CE practices. This classification system consists of four categories: economic efficiency metrics; environmental impact metrics; social impact metrics; and process/product design metrics. Each category contains several subcategories which further define specific types of indicators within each area. For example, under economic efficiency metrics there are subcategories such as resource productivity measures or cost savings measures which provide more detail on specific types of economic efficiency measurements that could be tracked using C-indicators.

Conclusion

This study provides an overview of existing C-indicator sets along with an effective classification system for understanding their purpose better so they can be used more effectively towards achieving sustainable development goals through CE practices. The proposed framework will help practitioners select appropriate indicator sets based on their needs while also providing guidance on how best to use them when tracking progress towards sustainability objectives related to CE implementation initiatives