MOCCA-SURVEY database I. Accreting white dwarf binary systems in globular clusters -- IV. cataclysmic variables -- properties of bright and faint populations
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Belloni et al. conducted a study on cataclysmic variables (CVs) in 288 globular cluster (GC) models using the MOCCA code.
- Destruction of primordial CV progenitors due to dynamical interactions within GCs is more common than the formation of new CVs through such interactions.
- Detectable CV populations in these GC models are mainly composed of CVs that have undergone a common envelope phase (CEP), accounting for over 70%.
- Only a small fraction (2-4%) of all CVs within a given GC are likely observable.
- Models with core collapse tend to host a higher proportion of bright CVs compared to non-core-collapsed models.
- Differentiation between bright and faint CV populations based on pre-CV and CV formation rates, as well as their characteristics at formation times and cluster half-mass relaxation times was introduced by Belloni et al.
- GC models adhering to an initial binary population model proposed by Kroupa and featuring low CEP efficiency offer better agreement with observed quantities of CVs in specific clusters like NGC 6397, NGC 6752, and 47 Tuc.
- Accurate identification and characterization of candidate objects as true CVs through obtaining essential parameters like orbital periods and mass ratios is crucial for advancing comparisons further.
Authors: Diogo Belloni, Mirek Giersz, Liliana E. Rivera Sandoval, Abbas Askar, Paweł Ciecieląg
Abstract: We investigate here populations of cataclysmic variables (CVs) in a set of 288 globular cluster (GC) models evolved with the MOCCA code. This is by far the largest sample of GC models ever analysed with respect to CVs. Contrary to what has been argued for a long time, we found that dynamical destruction of primordial CV progenitors is much stronger in GCs than dynamical formation of CVs, and that dynamically formed CVs and CVs formed under no/weak influence of dynamics have similar white dwarf mass distributions. In addition, we found that, on average, the detectable CV population is predominantly composed of CVs formed via typical common envelope phase (CEP) ($\gtrsim70$ per cent), that only $\approx2-4$ per cent of all CVs in a GC is likely to be detectable, and that core-collapsed models tend to have higher fractions of bright CVs than non-core-collapsed ones. We also consistently show, for the first time, that the properties of bright and faint CVs can be understood by means of the pre-CV and CV formation rates, their properties at their formation times and cluster half-mass relaxation times. Finally, we show that models following the initial binary population proposed by Kroupa and set with low CEP efficiency better reproduce the observed amount of CVs and CV candidates in NGC 6397, NGC 6752 and 47 Tuc. To progress with comparisons, the essential next step is to properly characterize the candidates as CVs (e.g. by obtaining orbital periods and mass ratios).
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.