Infrared Finiteness and Forward Scattering
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Infrared divergences cancel out in inclusive cross-sections in quantum field theory calculations.
- The Kinoshita-Lee-Nauenberg theorem states that the sum of initial and final states should eliminate these divergences.
- Recent research suggests that the theorem is weaker than previously thought, and it is sufficient to sum over either initial or final states for finiteness.
- The cancellation of infrared divergences typically requires the inclusion of forward scattering processes.
- Examples are provided to illustrate this revised understanding, such as $e^+e^- \to Z$ at next-to-leading order.
- Experimental limits on energy and angular resolution must include a limit on the momentum at which electric charge can be observed for Compton scattering to achieve infrared finiteness.
- Including degenerate initial states is important, as well as considering disconnected Feynman diagrams.
- Dressing initial or final-state charged particles is significant in properly defining the $S$ matrix in quantum field theory.
Authors: Christopher Frye, Holmfridur Hannesdottir, Nisarga Paul, Matthew D. Schwartz, Kai Yan
Abstract: Infrared divergences have long been heralded to cancel in sufficiently inclusive cross-sections, according to the famous Kinoshita-Lee-Nauenberg theorem which mandates an initial and final state sum. While well-motivated, this theorem is much weaker than necessary: for finiteness, one need only sum over initial $\textit{or}$ final states. Moreover, the cancellation generically requires the inclusion of the forward scattering process. We provide a number of examples showing the importance of this revised understanding: in $e^+e^- \to Z$ at next-to-leading order, one can sum over certain initial and final states with an arbitrary number of extra photons, or only over final states with a finite number of photons, if forward scattering is included. For Compton scattering, infrared finiteness requires the indistinguishability of hard forward-scattered electrons and photons. This implies that in addition to experimental limits on the energy and angular resolution, there must also be an experimental limit on the momentum at which electric charge can be observed. Similar considerations are required to explain why the rate for $\gamma \gamma$ to scatter into photons alone is infrared divergent but the rate for $\gamma \gamma$ to scatter into photons or charged particles is finite. This new understanding sheds light on the importance of including degenerate initial states in physical predictions, the relevance of disconnected Feynman diagrams, the importance of dressing initial or final-state charged particles, and the quest to properly define the $S$ matrix.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.