Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1809.08887v1

, , , , In their paper titled "Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task," authors Tao Yu, Rui Zhang, Kai Yang, Michihiro Yasunaga, Dongxu Wang, Zifan Li, James Ma, Irene Li, Qingning Yao, Shanelle Roman, Zilin Zhang, and Dragomir Radev introduce the comprehensive . This dataset was meticulously annotated by 11 college students and comprises 10,181 questions along with 5,693 intricate SQL queries derived from 200 databases featuring multiple tables across 138 diverse domains. One of the key distinguishing features of Spider is its emphasis on and . Unlike previous semantic parsing tasks that typically utilize a single database with identical programs in both training and testing sets, Spider introduces a novel approach where different complex SQL queries and database schemas are presented in the training and testing phases. This unique setup challenges models to generalize effectively to new SQL queries and database structures. The authors conducted experiments using various state-of-the-art models on the Spider dataset. Despite their efforts, the best-performing model achieved only a modest exact matching accuracy of 14.3% in a database split setting. This outcome underscores the formidable challenge that Spider poses for future research endeavors in the field of semantic parsing. The is publicly available at https://yale-lily.github.io/spider for researchers interested in exploring this complex and cross-domain semantic parsing task further. The study was presented as a long paper at EMNLP 2018 conference.

• - Paper titled "Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task"
• - Dataset annotated by 11 college students with 10,181 questions and 5,693 SQL queries from 200 databases across 138 domains
• - Emphasis on complex SQL queries and diverse database schemas
• - Unique training and testing approach with different SQL queries and schemas challenges model generalization
• - Best-performing model achieved modest exact matching accuracy of 14.3%
• - Dataset publicly available at https://yale-lily.github.io/spider for further research exploration

Summary1. A group of college students made a big set of questions and commands for computers to understand. 2. They used many different databases from various areas to create this set. 3. The focus was on making difficult computer commands and using different types of databases. 4. They tested how well the computer understood by giving it new challenges during training and testing. 5. The best computer model got about 14% right when matching exactly. Definitions- Dataset: A collection of information or data organized in a specific way for analysis or processing by a computer program. - SQL queries: Commands used to communicate with databases to retrieve, update, or manage data. - Schemas: The structure or design that defines how data is organized within a database system. - Generalization: The ability of a model or system to apply what it has learned from one situation to another similar but new situation. - Accuracy: How correct something is compared to the expected or true value.

Introduction

Semantic parsing is a crucial task in natural language processing (NLP) that involves mapping natural language utterances to structured representations, such as logical forms or SQL queries. This task has gained significant attention in recent years due to its potential applications in question-answering systems, dialogue systems, and information retrieval. However, the existing semantic parsing datasets are limited in their complexity and diversity, hindering the development of robust models. In their paper titled "Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task," authors Tao Yu et al. introduce a comprehensive dataset called Spider that aims to address these limitations. The dataset is meticulously annotated by 11 college students and comprises over 10,000 questions with complex SQL queries derived from 200 databases across 138 diverse domains.

The Spider Dataset

The Spider dataset is unique compared to previous semantic parsing datasets in several ways. Firstly, it features complex SQL queries that involve multiple tables and various types of clauses such as aggregation functions, nested subqueries, and joins. This complexity poses a significant challenge for current models as they struggle to generalize effectively to new query structures. Secondly, unlike other datasets where the training and testing sets have identical database schemas and programs, Spider introduces a novel setup where different databases are used for training and testing phases. This approach ensures that models must learn generalizable patterns rather than memorizing specific examples from the training set. Lastly, the authors also emphasize cross-domain generalization by including diverse domains such as geography, music reviews, sports statistics among others. This further increases the difficulty of the task as models need to be able to handle unfamiliar domains while still producing accurate results.

Data Collection Process

To create this extensive dataset with high-quality annotations requires considerable effort from human annotators. The authors recruited 11 college students with a background in computer science and trained them for two weeks on SQL and database concepts. The annotators were then given access to the databases and asked to generate natural language questions that could be answered using SQL queries. The authors also implemented several quality control measures, such as having multiple annotators label the same data independently and resolving any discrepancies through discussions. This rigorous process resulted in a high-quality dataset with accurate annotations.

Evaluation

To evaluate the performance of models on Spider, the authors conducted experiments using various state-of-the-art models, including sequence-to-sequence models and neural semantic parsers. Despite their efforts, the best-performing model achieved only a modest exact matching accuracy of 14.3% in a database split setting. This outcome highlights the difficulty of this task and underscores its potential for future research endeavors. The authors also compared their results with previous datasets such as WikiSQL and ATIS (Airline Travel Information System). They found that current models perform significantly better on these datasets due to their simpler query structures and limited domains. This further emphasizes the need for more challenging datasets like Spider to advance research in semantic parsing.

Availability

One of the significant contributions of this paper is making the Spider dataset publicly available at https://yale-lily.github.io/spider/. Researchers interested in exploring this complex and cross-domain semantic parsing task can access both training and testing sets along with detailed documentation about each database schema.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Tao Yu et al.'s paper introduces an extensive human-labeled dataset called Spider for complex and cross-domain semantic parsing tasks. The dataset's unique features challenge current models' ability to generalize effectively across different databases, schemas, and domains. The evaluation results demonstrate that there is still much room for improvement in this field, highlighting Spider's potential for future research endeavors. With its availability to researchers, the Spider dataset is expected to drive further advancements in semantic parsing and contribute to the development of more robust NLP models.