Contextual Bandits under Delayed Feedback
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper addresses the issue of delayed feedback in industrial systems using bandit algorithms
- Delayed feedback makes it challenging for the learner to distinguish between negative and positive signals that have not yet been received
- The authors propose a new UCB-based algorithm for contextual bandits with delayed and censored feedback
- The algorithm takes into account potential delay and censorship of feedback
- Finite time regret analysis is provided to quantify the performance of their algorithm compared to an optimal strategy
- Empirical evaluation shows the superiority of their algorithm in terms of performance and efficiency compared to existing approaches
- This research contributes to improving decision-making processes in various industrial systems by addressing the issue of delayed feedback in contextual bandit problems.
Authors: Claire Vernade, Alexandra Carpentier, Giovanni Zappella, Beyza Ermis, Michael Brueckner
Abstract: Delayed feedback is an ubiquitous problem in many industrial systems employing bandit algorithms. Most of those systems seek to optimize binary indicators as clicks. In that case, when the reward is not sent immediately, the learner cannot distinguish a negative signal from a not-yet-sent positive one: she might be waiting for a feedback that will never come. In this paper, we define and address the contextual bandit problem with delayed and censored feedback by providing a new UCB-based algorithm. In order to demonstrate its effectiveness, we provide a finite time regret analysis and an empirical evaluation that compares it against a baseline commonly used in practice.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.