Contextual Bandits under Delayed Feedback

AI-generated keywords: Delayed Feedback Contextual Bandits UCB-Algorithm Performance Efficiency

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper addresses the issue of delayed feedback in industrial systems using bandit algorithms
  • Delayed feedback makes it challenging for the learner to distinguish between negative and positive signals that have not yet been received
  • The authors propose a new UCB-based algorithm for contextual bandits with delayed and censored feedback
  • The algorithm takes into account potential delay and censorship of feedback
  • Finite time regret analysis is provided to quantify the performance of their algorithm compared to an optimal strategy
  • Empirical evaluation shows the superiority of their algorithm in terms of performance and efficiency compared to existing approaches
  • This research contributes to improving decision-making processes in various industrial systems by addressing the issue of delayed feedback in contextual bandit problems.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Claire Vernade, Alexandra Carpentier, Giovanni Zappella, Beyza Ermis, Michael Brueckner

Abstract: Delayed feedback is an ubiquitous problem in many industrial systems employing bandit algorithms. Most of those systems seek to optimize binary indicators as clicks. In that case, when the reward is not sent immediately, the learner cannot distinguish a negative signal from a not-yet-sent positive one: she might be waiting for a feedback that will never come. In this paper, we define and address the contextual bandit problem with delayed and censored feedback by providing a new UCB-based algorithm. In order to demonstrate its effectiveness, we provide a finite time regret analysis and an empirical evaluation that compares it against a baseline commonly used in practice.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Jul. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1807.02089v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Contextual Bandits under Delayed Feedback" addresses the issue of delayed feedback in industrial systems that employ bandit algorithms. These systems aim to optimize binary indicators, such as clicks. However, when the reward is not sent immediately, it becomes challenging for the learner to distinguish between a negative signal and a positive one that has not yet been received. This ambiguity can lead to the learner waiting indefinitely for feedback that may never arrive. To tackle this problem, the authors propose a new UCB-based algorithm for contextual bandits with delayed and censored feedback. They define and address this specific variant of the contextual bandit problem by developing an algorithm that takes into account the potential delay and censorship of feedback. To demonstrate the effectiveness of their proposed algorithm, the authors provide a finite time regret analysis which quantifies how much worse their algorithm performs compared to an optimal strategy. Additionally, they conduct an empirical evaluation comparing their algorithm against a commonly used baseline in practice. The findings of their empirical evaluation highlight the superiority of their UCB-based algorithm in terms of performance and efficiency compared to existing approaches. By addressing the issue of delayed feedback in contextual bandit problems, this research contributes to improving decision-making processes in various industrial systems.
Created on 23 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.