The Gion Shrine Problem: A Solution in Geometry
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Japan valued isolation and peace in the eighteenth century
- Significant advancements in education and the arts were made during this time
- The Gion Shrine problem, a mathematical tablet, was posted by an unknown author before 1749
- The problem has intrigued individuals for over two centuries
- Some proposed solutions require mathematical knowledge not available in Japan at that time
- The problem remains unsolved to this day
- Melissa Holly's paper "The Gion Shrine Problem: A Solution in Geometry" explores the enigma using Edo Period Japan's geometry
- The solution presented in the paper is rooted in the cultural context of eighteenth century Japan
- It demonstrates how Japan fostered an environment conducive to intellectual pursuits like mathematics
- Melissa Holly's paper offers a unique perspective on solving the Gion Shrine problem by incorporating historical and cultural elements from Edo Period Japan
Authors: Melissa Holly
Abstract: Eighteenth century Japan was a time of isolation and peace, where education and the arts blossomed. Originally posted before 1749 by an unknown author, the sangaku (mathematical tablet) that became known as the Gion Shrine problem, has puzzled people from all walks of life for more than two centuries. Although solutions have been suggested, some of them require mathematics not known in Japan at the time the Gion Shrine problem was written. The problem is still considered unsolved. Using the geometry of Edo Period Japan, the paper's solution is immersed in the culture of that time frame. As identified in this paper, the problem's author deeply understood both the challenge, and inherent beauty, presented by simplicity.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.